Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-traceabilitynpx skills add adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server --skill task-traceabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-traceability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-traceability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-traceability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00122 | $0.02106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00061 | $0.01053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00421 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
task-traceability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Traceability — Foundational Layer
Traceability is not optional. It is the foundation that makes the Plan→Build→Verify→Review→Accept chain auditable, handoffs reliable, and sign-off meaningful. Every link must produce a traceable record. A single broken link breaks the entire chain.
The Universal Five-Step Pattern
Every role in the chain follows the same five-step pattern, applied to its specific context:
Step 1: Trace (追溯)
└── Identify all upstream requirements and artifacts you must reference
Step 2: Execute (执行)
└── Do the work, following the traced requirements
Step 3: Map (映射)
└── Link every output back to a specific upstream requirement
Step 4: Evidence (举证)
└── Provide proof that each mapping is correct and complete
Step 5: Record (记录)
└── Persist the traceability record so downstream roles can pick up the chain
Why five steps? Without Trace, you don't know what to do. Without Map, nobody knows why you did it. Without Evidence, your output is unverifiable. Without Record, the next link starts blind.
Why Every Link Matters
Plan ──→ Build ──→ Verify ──→ Review ──→ Accept
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ └── Break here → sign-off is unverifiable
│ │ │ └── Break here → audit trail is incomplete
│ │ └── Break here → verification is untrustworthy
│ └── Break here → implementation is untraceable
└── Break here → entire chain starts without a foundation
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Traceability must be enforced at every link.
Role-Specific Application
Plan — Blueprint Traceability
Plan is the chain's foundation. If blueprint traceability is broken, every downstream link is working from ambiguity.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Trace | Read the original requirement. Extract business goals, constraints, scope boundaries, and success criteria. |
| Execute | Design the blueprint: architecture, interfaces, data flow. Break into ordered Build steps, each with completion criteria. |
| Map | Every Build step must trace back to a specific requirement. Every completion criterion must be objectively verifiable. |
| Evidence | Self-check: can a Builder start from this blueprint alone? Are edge cases covered? Are interfaces unambiguous? |
| Record | Write the blueprint document. Push tasks to the orchestrator queue. Store the blueprint in shared context (set-context). Notify Leader. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 155 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3cb038ebf8f9
task-traceability is a skill published in the GitHub repository adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 122 tokens to every session and 2,106 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
autotask-creator
Rules for automation CRUD from the group-chat commander. The commander does not call mutation tools and does not edit cloud/autotasks files directly. It emits one or more top-level ... containers in its final text; the bus parses and applies them after the turn.
monorepo-management
Master monorepo management with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces to build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management. Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies.