Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit --skill verify-citationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/verify-citations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00624 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
verify-citations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Citations Skill
Audit citations for correctness. Checks that every \cite{KEY} has a matching BibTeX entry and verifies each entry against online search.
Examples
/verify-citations-- auto-detect the .tex and .bib files in the project/verify-citations paper/my_paper.tex-- audit a specific file/verify-citations --key blume1983-- verify single entry
Workflow
-
Find the main
.texfile: checkpaper/,latex_template/, then the project root for files containing\documentclass. If multiple candidates exist, ask the user which to audit. Extract all\cite{KEY}and\citep{KEY}commands. -
Find the
.bibfile: check the same directory as the.texfile, then the project root. Read the full BibTeX database. -
For each citation key: a. Check KEY exists in .bib -- if missing, flag as MISSING b. Extract: author, title, year, journal from the BibTeX entry c. Use
search_papersto verify:"{title}" {first author surname} {year}d. Useget_paper_detailsto confirm details when a match is found e. Build comparison table:Field BibTeX value Search result Match? Authors {from .bib} {from search} Y/N/-- Title ... ... Y/N/-- Year ... ... Y/N/-- Journal ... ... Y/N/-- Use Y = confirmed, N = mismatch, -- = not found in search. CRITICAL: If search returns blank for a field, write "NOT FOUND IN SEARCH" -- NEVER fill from memory.
-
Classify each citation:
- OK: ALL fields confirmed
- PARTIAL: Authors + title confirmed, journal/volume not found
- MISMATCH: Fields contradict search results
- UNVERIFIED: Cannot find paper online
- MISSING: Key in \cite{} but not in .bib
-
For forthcoming papers: use
search_paperswith additional queries as fallback to check journal placement -
Output verification report:
Citation Audit: [detected .tex file] Total: N citations checked OK: X | Partial: Y | Mismatch: Z | Missing: W --- FLAGGED ENTRIES --- [KEY] STATUS: details...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 57 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A b556e10e372c
verify-citations is a skill published in the GitHub repository Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 624 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fin-viz-launch
A tool for turning research data and a written description into academic charts. It can choose a suitable chart type, create plotting code with matplotlib or seaborn, and save the result as a high-resolution PDF, SVG, or PNG.
experiment-design
Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".
paper-verification
Use when the user wants to verify paper claims against code or data, audit numerical accuracy, check formula-code alignment, or validate citation accuracy. Triggers on phrases like "verify claims", "check numbers", "do the numbers match", "formula vs code", "audit the paper", or "cross-check results".
paper-writing
Use when the user wants to write, structure, or revise academic paper sections, improve notation consistency, or refine figures and tables. Triggers on phrases like "write the abstract", "structure the methods", "improve this section", "notation consistency", "figure refinement", or "paper structure".
reproduce
End-to-end paper reproduction from arxiv URL through smoke runs to replication experiments. Handles missing or partial official code, missing training scripts, missing hyperparameters, and private datasets via similar-public-dataset substitution. Use when the user asks to reproduce, implement, replicate, or re-run a…
kami-deck
A lab-meeting deck on gut-microbiome links to sleep quality — the design, the results, the caveats, and the next experiment. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for lab group, PI.