AgentTeams is a runtime platform where multiple AI agents collaborate in shared Matrix rooms under the coordination of a manager. It is for human-supervised or enterprise workflows that need visible, auditable cooperation among agents running on different runtimes, with shared files and centralized traffic management.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/agentscope-ai/agentteams/file-sharingnpx skills add agentscope-ai/AgentTeams --skill file-sharinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentscope-ai/AgentTeamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/agentteams/file-sharing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/agentteams/file-sharing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/agentteams/file-sharing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00507 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
file-sharing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
File Sharing
Use local shared paths only. Do not expose storage internals.
Local Paths
Use:
shared/tasks/{task-id}/shared/projects/{project-id}/only for read-only project context
Directory sync paths must end with /. If a directory pull fails, report the filesync result instead of creating local placeholder directories or switching to absolute paths.
Do not use in chat, task outputs, or normal reasoning:
agentteams/agentteams-storage/...teams/{team}/shared/.../root/agentteams-fs/.../root/agentteams-fs/agents/...
Task Lifecycle Sync
taskflow(action="ack_task") and taskflow(action="submit_task") handle all task lifecycle file sync internally (pull, push, stat). Do not call filesync separately for these operations.
Non-Task Shared Files
For shared files outside the task lifecycle (project context, reference materials), call filesync before reading:
{
"action": "pull",
"payload": {
"path": "shared/projects/{project-id}/"
}
}
To push mid-task progress or non-result files that the coordinator needs before submission:
{
"action": "push",
"payload": {
"path": "shared/tasks/{task-id}/progress/",
"exclude": ["spec.md", "base/"]
}
}
If You Cannot Find Files
-
Call
filesyncwithaction="pull"forshared/tasks/{task-id}/. -
Check
pwd, then check the local relative path from the task message:pwd ls -la ls -la shared/tasks/{task-id}/ -
If still missing, @mention your coordinator with the
filesyncoutcome and the exact local path you checked:
@coordinator:domain BLOCKED: I pulled shared/tasks/{task-id}/ but cannot find shared/tasks/{task-id}/spec.md.
Do not search random container absolute paths or create the missing task directory yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 73 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A bf80f8b497d0
file-sharing is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentscope-ai/AgentTeams (5,567 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 507 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship
Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, and create a PR. Use for an explicit /ship invocation or when the user requests the full ship, release, or deploy workflow. For an ordinary commit, push, or pull-request publishing request, use the built-in…
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when…
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…
autoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…
design-review
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…