Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/agiflow/ai-plugin/project-plannpx skills add AgiFlow/ai-plugin --skill project-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgiFlow/ai-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agiflow/ai-plugin/project-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agiflow/ai-plugin/project-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agiflow/ai-plugin/project-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00211 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
project-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to project-plan — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Agiflow Project Plan
Create a focused near-term plan. Plan tasks first and leave work-unit creation to backlog grooming.
Workflow
- Call
get_current_scopeand resolve the target project withlist_projectswhen needed. - Call
get_project_detail,list_project_statuses, andlist_tasksto understand goals, configured statuses, and existing work. - Ask only the questions needed to resolve the intended outcome, users, scope, constraints, and definition of done.
- Check for duplicate or overlapping tasks before proposing new ones.
- Decompose the outcome into small vertical slices that can be completed and verified independently.
- For each proposed task, include:
- Clear title
- Outcome-focused description
- At least two testable acceptance criteria
- Explicit in-scope and out-of-scope boundaries
- Priority and useful categorization tags
- Dependencies or sequencing notes when relevant
- Present the complete task plan and request approval before writing.
- After approval, use
batch_create_tasksfor multiple tasks orcreate_taskfor one task. Use the exact Planning status name returned bylist_project_statuses. - Call
list_tasksto verify the created tasks and report any per-item errors.
Planning Rules
- Do not create work units in this workflow.
- Do not promote tasks to Todo.
- Prefer the smallest plan that delivers useful progress.
- Split tasks that combine unrelated outcomes or cannot be verified independently.
- Preserve existing work and avoid duplicates.
Response
Report created task titles, priorities, dependencies, and any tasks that still need user decisions. Recommend refine-task for ambiguous tasks or backlog-grooming when the Planning backlog is ready.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 39 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7ecfd753e775
project-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgiFlow/ai-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 421 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to project-plan, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
wayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
sap-transport-overview
System-wide inventory of open transport requests — every visible modifiable request, who owns it, how big it is, and supported risk signals such as empty/local requests, explicit locks, and confirmed manifest overlaps. Headers-only and cheap; NO source diffs. Use when asked "what transports are open in the system"…
timeline-creator
Create HTML timelines and project roadmaps with Gantt charts, milestones, phase groupings, and progress indicators. Use when users request timelines, roadmaps, Gantt charts, project schedules, or milestone visualizations.
pm-all
Skill "pm-all" from wei63w/pm-manager, covering user input, outline and shared workflow (all /pm- commands).
bootstrap-prd
Set up PRD-driven development infrastructure for a new project, including directory structure, templates, and roadmap.
finn-spec
Interview the user about a raw idea until confident, then file a build-ready issue in Linear. Use when asked to run Finn-loop's spec interview, draft a queue-ready issue, or plan a feature. Interactive — requires the user present; never run unattended.