Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/experiment-queuenpx skills add AI4Scientist/nano-scientist --skill experiment-queuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AI4Scientist/nano-scientistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/experiment-queue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/experiment-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/experiment-queue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00078 | $0.04214 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.02107 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00843 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00421 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-queue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 381 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A ff65195fee51
experiment-queue is a skill published in the GitHub repository AI4Scientist/nano-scientist (127 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 4,214 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
experiment-execution
Execute AI/ML experiments locally or remotely with environment, runtime, and logging controls. Prefer invoking via research-workflow. TRIGGER when: user asks to run/launch/start/resume/monitor a training job, evaluation, or benchmark, or a plan is ready for execution, or experiment needs rerun/recovery. DO NOT TRIGGER…
paper-writing
Write CS/AI papers with progressive disclosure. Prefer invoking via research-workflow. TRIGGER when: user explicitly asks to draft/write/revise a paper, paper section (abstract, intro, related work, method, experiments, conclusion), rebuttal, or LaTeX content. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user mentions papers but needs…
latchbio-integration
Build, register, debug, and operate bioinformatics workflows on Latch using the Python SDK, CLI, Latch Data and Registry, Nextflow, Snakemake, programmatic execution, and Latch MCP. Use when authoring or deploying Latch workflows, configuring resources or interfaces, moving data, integrating Registry, or launching and…
anti-autoresearch
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) →…
baseline-comparison-audit
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent…
eval-design-forensics
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan…