Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aidi1723/safe-agent-skills --skill code-tdd-guide-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aidi1723/safe-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidi1723/safe-agent-skills/code-tdd-guide-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidi1723/safe-agent-skills/code-tdd-guide-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidi1723/safe-agent-skills/code-tdd-guide-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidi1723/safe-agent-skills/code-tdd-guide-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidi1723/safe-agent-skills/code-tdd-guide-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
code-tdd-guide-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
77% identical to business-code-to-prd-review — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Tdd Guide Review
When To Use
Use this draft when reviewing the tdd-guide metadata-only
candidate from claude-skills before deciding whether to author a local
OneCode skill, merge it into an existing skill, or keep it reference-only.
Safe Workflow
- Identify the task, audience, owner, source domain, target catalog category, and expected artifact.
- Compare the candidate with existing trusted Safe-Agent-Skills to avoid duplicate or overlapping guidance.
- Draft local OneCode guidance from project requirements and operator review; do not copy upstream skill bodies.
- Check provenance, license notes, runtime permissions, and connector assumptions before import.
- Produce an adoption recommendation only; Do not execute upstream content or mark this draft trusted.
Expected Output
- metadata-only candidate summary
- overlap and merge recommendation
- local authoring notes
- required verifier checklist
- adoption decision: convert, merge, keep reference-only, or reject
Verifier Expectations
- metadata-only boundary check
- duplicate skill check
- provenance and license check
- import, serial approval, schema-check, maintain-check, and verify before trust
Draft Metadata
- upstream candidate:
tdd-guide - source domain:
engineering-team - source path:
engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide - mapped category:
code - score:
45 - priority:
P3 - adoption before draft:
reference_only
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 8b7a1f5f5487
code-tdd-guide-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aidi1723/safe-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 348 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 77% identical to business-code-to-prd-review, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…