Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aigentive/RalphX --skill testing-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aigentive/RalphXWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00691 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Patterns
TDD Workflow
The Cycle
- Write a failing test - Define expected behavior
- Implement - Minimum code to pass
- Refactor - Improve code quality
- Repeat - Next test case
Why TDD
- Tests define requirements clearly
- Catches regressions early
- Forces modular design
- Documents expected behavior
TypeScript Testing (Vitest)
Setup
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
Component Tests
describe('MyComponent', () => {
it('should render the title', () => {
render(<MyComponent title="Hello" />);
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('should call onChange when clicked', async () => {
const onChange = vi.fn();
render(<MyComponent onChange={onChange} />);
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
expect(onChange).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
Hook Tests
import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react';
it('should increment counter', () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter());
act(() => {
result.current.increment();
});
expect(result.current.count).toBe(1);
});
Mocking
// Mock Tauri invoke
vi.mock('@tauri-apps/api/core', () => ({
invoke: vi.fn(),
}));
// Mock module
vi.mock('./api', () => ({
fetchData: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: [] }),
}));
Rust Testing
Unit Tests
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_addition() {
assert_eq!(add(2, 2), 4);
}
#[test]
#[should_panic(expected = "divide by zero")]
fn test_divide_by_zero() {
divide(1, 0);
}
}
Async Tests
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_async_operation() {
let result = fetch_data().await;
assert!(result.is_ok());
}
Integration Tests
// tests/integration.rs
use ralphx_lib::AppState;
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_full_workflow() {
let state = AppState::new_test();
// Test complete workflow
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 4e5e41826369
testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository aigentive/RalphX (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 691 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…