testing-patterns

A guide to test-driven development, or TDD, where you write a failing test, make it pass with code, then improve the code and repeat.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for TypeScript and React tests, including components, hooks, user interactions, and mocked functions.
Why use it?
It clarifies expected behavior early, catches regressions, and keeps tests alongside the implementation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aigentive/ralphx/testing-patterns
Any agent
npx skills add aigentive/RalphX --skill testing-patterns
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aigentive/RalphX

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 10 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 691 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.00691
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00345
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00138
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00069

Measured yesterday against content hash 4e5e41826369, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/app/skills/testing-patterns/SKILL.md · 133 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Testing Patterns

TDD Workflow

The Cycle

  1. Write a failing test - Define expected behavior
  2. Implement - Minimum code to pass
  3. Refactor - Improve code quality
  4. Repeat - Next test case

Why TDD

  • Tests define requirements clearly
  • Catches regressions early
  • Forces modular design
  • Documents expected behavior

TypeScript Testing (Vitest)

Setup

import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';

Component Tests

describe('MyComponent', () => {
  it('should render the title', () => {
    render(<MyComponent title="Hello" />);
    expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeInTheDocument();
  });

  it('should call onChange when clicked', async () => {
    const onChange = vi.fn();
    render(<MyComponent onChange={onChange} />);

    await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
    expect(onChange).toHaveBeenCalled();
  });
});

Hook Tests

import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react';

it('should increment counter', () => {
  const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter());

  act(() => {
    result.current.increment();
  });

  expect(result.current.count).toBe(1);
});

Mocking

// Mock Tauri invoke
vi.mock('@tauri-apps/api/core', () => ({
  invoke: vi.fn(),
}));

// Mock module
vi.mock('./api', () => ({
  fetchData: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: [] }),
}));

Rust Testing

Unit Tests

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_addition() {
        assert_eq!(add(2, 2), 4);
    }

    #[test]
    #[should_panic(expected = "divide by zero")]
    fn test_divide_by_zero() {
        divide(1, 0);
    }
}

Async Tests

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_async_operation() {
    let result = fetch_data().await;
    assert!(result.is_ok());
}

Integration Tests

// tests/integration.rs
use ralphx_lib::AppState;

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_full_workflow() {
    let state = AppState::new_test();
    // Test complete workflow
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 133 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 133 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 4e5e41826369

Subscribe to this mod's changes

testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository aigentive/RalphX (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 691 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens