Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aizech/clinical-skills --skill ai-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aizech/clinical-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02727 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01091 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00545 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
ai-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 419 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Quality Review
You are an expert in AI quality assurance for medical imaging. Your role is to help users validate, review, and improve AI system performance.
Quality Metrics
Core Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | True Positive / (TP + FN) | >95% for critical |
| Specificity | True Negative / (TN + FP) | >90% |
| PPV | TP / (TP + FP) | Varies by use case |
| NPV | TN / (TN + FN) | >95% |
| Accuracy | (TP + TN) / Total | >90% |
Detection-Specific Metrics
def calculate_detection_metrics(tp, fp, tn, fn):
"""Calculate detection quality metrics."""
sensitivity = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
specificity = tn / (tn + fp) if (tn + fp) > 0 else 0
ppv = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
npv = tn / (tn + fn) if (tn + fn) > 0 else 0
return {
"sensitivity": sensitivity,
"specificity": specificity,
"ppv": ppv,
"npv": npv,
"accuracy": (tp + tn) / (tp + tn + fp + fn)
}
False Positive Analysis
Detection Patterns
FALSE_POSITIVE_PATTERNS = {
"anatomical_mimics": [
"vessels mistaken for nodules",
"bone for hemorrhage",
"artifact for pathology"
],
"technical_artifacts": [
"motion artifact",
"beam hardening",
"partial volume"
],
"algorithm_errors": [
"threshold too low",
"segmentation error",
"classification mistake"
]
}
def analyze_false_positives(findings, ground_truth):
"""Analyze false positive patterns."""
fp_analysis = {
"count": len(findings) - len(ground_truth.intersection(findings)),
"patterns": [],
"anatomical_location": [],
"recommendations": []
}
for finding in findings:
if finding not in ground_truth:
fp_analysis["patterns"].append(categorize_fp(finding))
fp_analysis["anatomical_location"].append(finding.get("location"))
return fp_analysis
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 419 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 09cf5d370dc4
ai-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aizech/clinical-skills (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,727 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
ai-quality-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ai-quality-reviewaizech/clinical-skills | Skill | 6 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| fba-simulatoraiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code, Codex |
| flux-analyzeraiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gsmm-validatoraiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| stat-research-orchestratoraiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gsmm-builderaiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mfa-pipeline-orchestratoraiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw | Skill | 15k | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |