Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aizech/clinical-skills --skill ai-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aizech/clinical-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/ai-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02727 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01363 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00545 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
ai-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 419 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Quality Review
You are an expert in AI quality assurance for medical imaging. Your role is to help users validate, review, and improve AI system performance.
Quality Metrics
Core Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | True Positive / (TP + FN) | >95% for critical |
| Specificity | True Negative / (TN + FP) | >90% |
| PPV | TP / (TP + FP) | Varies by use case |
| NPV | TN / (TN + FN) | >95% |
| Accuracy | (TP + TN) / Total | >90% |
Detection-Specific Metrics
def calculate_detection_metrics(tp, fp, tn, fn):
"""Calculate detection quality metrics."""
sensitivity = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
specificity = tn / (tn + fp) if (tn + fp) > 0 else 0
ppv = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
npv = tn / (tn + fn) if (tn + fn) > 0 else 0
return {
"sensitivity": sensitivity,
"specificity": specificity,
"ppv": ppv,
"npv": npv,
"accuracy": (tp + tn) / (tp + tn + fp + fn)
}
False Positive Analysis
Detection Patterns
FALSE_POSITIVE_PATTERNS = {
"anatomical_mimics": [
"vessels mistaken for nodules",
"bone for hemorrhage",
"artifact for pathology"
],
"technical_artifacts": [
"motion artifact",
"beam hardening",
"partial volume"
],
"algorithm_errors": [
"threshold too low",
"segmentation error",
"classification mistake"
]
}
def analyze_false_positives(findings, ground_truth):
"""Analyze false positive patterns."""
fp_analysis = {
"count": len(findings) - len(ground_truth.intersection(findings)),
"patterns": [],
"anatomical_location": [],
"recommendations": []
}
for finding in findings:
if finding not in ground_truth:
fp_analysis["patterns"].append(categorize_fp(finding))
fp_analysis["anatomical_location"].append(finding.get("location"))
return fp_analysis
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 419 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 09cf5d370dc4
ai-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aizech/clinical-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,727 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
flux-analyzer
Analyse FBA flux distributions to extract biological insights. Covers gene essentiality, phenotypic phase planes, flux sampling, pathway-level aggregation, secretion product prediction, and production of publication- quality figures.
fba-simulator
Run Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and related constraint-based simulations using COBRApy. Covers standard FBA, parsimonious FBA (pFBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA), loopless FBA, gene/reaction knockouts, and carbon source swapping. Outputs flux distributions and CSV files.
gsmm-validator
Validate a COBRApy genome-scale metabolic model for mass/charge balance, stoichiometric consistency, biomass producibility, dead-end metabolites, thermodynamic loops, and GPR rule formatting. Outputs a structured validation report with errors and warnings.
metabolic-study-planner
Plan publishable constraint-based metabolic modelling studies when the user has a broad biological or metabolic-engineering topic but no concrete dataset, organism, model, or hypothesis. Selects feasible BiGG/COBRA models, objectives, perturbations, analyses, metrics, figures, and risk controls before FBA code is…
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
stat-research-orchestrator
Orchestrate a statistical research pipeline centered on formal problem formulation, method proposal, theoretical analysis, experimental evaluation, comparison, and final result synthesis.