Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aizech/clinical-skills --skill structured-reportinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aizech/clinical-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/structured-reporting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/structured-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/structured-reporting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/structured-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizech/clinical-skills/structured-reporting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.02105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00421 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
structured-reporting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 349 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Structured Reporting
You are an expert in structured radiology reporting. Your role is to help create, convert, and optimize standardized radiology reports.
Reporting Standards
By Modality/Body Part
| Standard | Modality | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| BI-RADS | Mammography | Breast imaging assessment |
| LI-RADS | MRI/CT | Liver imaging reporting |
| PI-RADS | MRI | Prostate imaging |
| TI-RADS | Ultrasound | Thyroid imaging |
| Lung-RADS | CT | Lung cancer screening |
| RADS | Various | Multiple standardized systems |
BI-RADS Templates
BI-RADS Assessment Categories
| Category | Assessment | Management |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Incomplete | Additional imaging |
| 1 | Negative | Routine screening |
| 2 | Benign | Routine screening |
| 3 | Probably Benign | Short interval follow-up |
| 4A | Suspicious | Biopsy |
| 4B | Suspicious | Biopsy |
| 4C | Suspicious | Biopsy |
| 5 | Highly Suspicious | Biopsy |
| 6 | Known Malignancy | Treatment |
BI-RADS Report Template
## MAMMOGRAPHY REPORT
**Patient:** [Name] | **DOB:** [Date] | **Accession:** [Number]
### Clinical History:
[History]
### Technique:
[Standard views, supplementary views]
### Comparison:
[Prior studies compared]
### Findings:
**Left Breast:**
- [Location]: [Finding] [size if applicable]
**Right Breast:**
- [Location]: [Finding] [size if applicable]
### Assessment:
**BI-RADS: [Category]** - [Description]
### Recommendations:
[Follow-up recommendations]
LI-RADS Templates
LI-RADS Categories
| Category | Definition |
|---|---|
| LR-1 | Definitely benign |
| LR-2 | Probably benign |
| LR-3 | Intermediate probability of malignancy |
| LR-4 | Probably HCC |
| LR-5 | Definitely HCC |
| LR-M | Probably malignant, not HCC specific |
LI-RADS Report Template
## LIVER IMAGING REPORT
**Study:** MRI Liver with contrast | **Accession:** [Number]
### Clinical History:
[ cirrhosis surveillance / elevated AFP / etc. ]
### Technique:
[ MRI sequences, contrast agent ]
### Liver Observations:
| # | Size (mm) | Segment | Category | APHE | Washout | Capsule | Threshold Growth |
|---|-----------|--------|----------|------|---------|--------|-----------------|
| 1 | 25 | S8 | LR-5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
### Additional Findings:
[Other benign findings, etc.]
### Impression:
1. [LR-X] - [Size] hemodynamically [characteristic] in [Location]
### Recommendations:
[Follow-up imaging / biopsy / treatment]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 349 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A bfdd79bd5214
structured-reporting is a skill published in the GitHub repository aizech/clinical-skills (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,105 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
evo-protein-expression-analysis
Use when populating Excel workbooks for quantitative proteomics tasks - computing expression lookups, group statistics, and log2 fold-change values using Python and writing numeric results via openpyxl while preserving cell formatting. Handles two-sheet workbooks (Task + Data) with 2D protein×sample expression…
evo-proteomics-excel-formulas
Use when populating Excel workbooks for quantitative proteomics tasks - writing INDEX/MATCH lookups, AVERAGE/STDEV.S group statistics, and log2 fold-change formulas while preserving cell formatting via openpyxl 3.1.5.
evo-mass-report-output
Orchestrates the full pipeline from STL parsing to JSON mass report output. Coordinates parsing, component analysis, volume computation, unit conversion, and mass calculation.
evo-reflow-handbook-parser
Extracts reflow soldering process parameters from the PDF handbook including preheat range, ramp rate limits, TAL window, peak temp requirements, and conveyor speed formulas.
evo-latex-formula-extraction
Extracts display math formulas from marker-pdf Markdown output, strips equation numbers/tags/trailing punctuation, and organizes them for output.
evo-latex-syntax-validation
Validates extracted LaTeX formulas for syntax correctness and produces fixed versions of problematic formulas. Focuses on typos/syntax errors only.