Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop --skill review-my-supportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/review-my-support)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/review-my-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/review-my-support/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/review-my-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/review-my-support.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.01273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
review-my-support scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review My Support
One skill for rollup / readout / review. Branches on scope.
When to use
- weekly - "Monday review" / "weekly support readout" / "how was support week?" / Monday cron routine.
- help-center-digest - "weekly help-center digest" / "what happened in docs this week?" / Sunday cron routine.
- account-review - "prep account review for {account}" / "outline for check-in with {customer}."
Connections I need
I run external work through Composio. Before this skill runs I check that the categories below are linked. Missing → I name the category, ask you to connect it from the Integrations tab, stop.
- Docs / notes (Google Docs / Notion) - publish the readout where your team will actually read it. Optional, falls back to local markdown.
- Messaging (Slack) - drop the weekly summary into a team channel. Optional.
- CRM (HubSpot / Attio) - pull account record for account-review scope. Required for
account-review. - Billing (Stripe) - pull monthly revenue and renewal date for account-review scope. Required for
account-review.
If you ask for an account review and your CRM isn't connected I stop and ask you to connect it.
Information I need
I read your support context first. For every required field that's missing I ask ONE plain-language question (best modality: connected app > file drop > URL > paste) and wait.
- Product surface + plan tier map - Required. Why I need it: rollups group items by domain and tier. If missing I ask: "Which plans do you sell, and roughly what does each one include?"
- Account-review segment - Required for
account-review. Why I need it: not every customer gets an account review; I need the line. If missing I ask: "Which customers do you actually do account reviews with - enterprise only, anything above a certain monthly revenue?" - Review cadence - Required for
weekly. Why I need it: window for the rollup. If missing I ask: "Do you want this weekly, every other week, or monthly?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 99 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A e5a0e3f7392b
review-my-support is a skill published in the GitHub repository akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
customer-support-expert
Build comprehensive customer support systems including ticketing, knowledge management, SLA tracking, and customer satisfaction analytics. Use when the user mentions helpdesk or service desk, ticketing, SLA targets, knowledge bases, escalation workflows, CSAT/NPS, or customer success operations.
Zendesk Automation
Automate customer support workflows with Zendesk ticket management, routing, and analytics.
auto-tag
Automatically analyze and tag untagged Gorgias tickets based on content.
bug-report
Extract a structured bug report from a support ticket and create a Linear issue.
escalate
Escalate a support ticket to a Linear issue and notify the team on Slack.
merge-tickets
Find and flag duplicate or related Gorgias tickets that should be merged.