Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add albertobarnabo/lazy-cat --skill surgicalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/albertobarnabo/lazy-catWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/albertobarnabo/lazy-cat/surgical)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/albertobarnabo/lazy-cat/surgical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/albertobarnabo/lazy-cat/surgical/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/albertobarnabo/lazy-cat/surgical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/albertobarnabo/lazy-cat/surgical.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00131 | $0.01078 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00066 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
surgical scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Surgical — Build Exactly What Was Asked
"Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." — Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Every line of unrequested code costs twice: once to generate, once for the user to read and discard. Match the output scope to the request scope. Nothing more.
Override this skill immediately when:
- The user explicitly asks for a complete or production-ready implementation
- The request is for error handling, validation, or tests (those are the task, not scope creep)
- Safety or security genuinely requires defensive code
The Rule
Before writing any function, class, or block, ask one question:
Did the user explicitly ask for this?
YES → write it
NO → don't write it
What Scope Creep Looks Like
Error handling for cases that can't happen
# Asked: write a function that doubles a number
# Scope creep:
def double(n):
if n is None:
raise ValueError("n cannot be None")
if not isinstance(n, (int, float)):
raise TypeError("n must be numeric")
return n * 2
# Correct:
def double(n):
return n * 2
If the caller controls the input and None is impossible in context, the guards are noise.
Abstractions for one-time use
// Asked: format a date as YYYY-MM-DD in one place
// Scope creep:
class DateFormatter {
constructor(private format: string) {}
format(date: Date): string { ... }
static forISO() { return new DateFormatter('YYYY-MM-DD'); }
}
// Correct:
const formatted = date.toISOString().split('T')[0];
Three similar lines is better than a premature abstraction.
Unrequested tests
If the user says "fix this bug", fix the bug. Don't add a test suite unless asked. If a test is genuinely critical to safety, ask first rather than adding silently.
Refactoring surrounding code
If the task is to fix function A, don't rename variables in function B, reorder imports, or clean up unrelated logic. The user can't easily review what they didn't ask for.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 163 lines · 131 tokens per session scan A be0b3c54db4a
surgical is a skill published in the GitHub repository albertobarnabo/lazy-cat (50 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 131 tokens to every session and 1,078 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
incident-response
Manage active production incidents through detection, triage, mitigation, communication, and resolution with structured roles and decision-making. Use this skill whenever the user has an active incident, a production issue, a service outage, a security incident, or needs to plan incident response procedures. Triggers…
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.