Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alebgl77/claude-inc --skill legal-risk-assessmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-incWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/legal-risk-assessment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/legal-risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/legal-risk-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/legal-risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/legal-risk-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
legal-risk-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legal Risk Assessment — Risk Assessor
"Flag legal risk"
Turns "this feels risky" into a scored, sorted register with owners and tripwires. Works from a description of the situation plus any documents provided.
When to use
- "What's our exposure if we sign this?" — deal downside read
- "How risky is operating without a signed DPA for a quarter?"
- "Rank the legal risks of this expansion plan"
- Before an exec or board commit on a contested move
- Clause-level contract surgery belongs to
review-contract; this skill scores the whole situation
Workflow
- Frame the situation: the decision at stake, timeline, jurisdictions, counterparties, and what "bad" concretely looks like for the business.
- Enumerate risks across the standard surfaces — contractual, regulatory, IP, privacy and data, employment, litigation, reputational-with-legal-consequence. Each risk is a concrete event ("residuals clause lets the vendor reuse our roadmap"), never a category name ("IP risk").
- Score each risk: impact 1-5 (1 = nuisance cost … 5 = company-changing) × likelihood 1-5 (1 = remote … 5 = expected). Score = impact × likelihood, with a one-line rationale per score — unexplained numbers are guesses.
- Render the heat map sorted by score, descending.
- Attach a mitigation to every risk at or above threshold (default: score ≥ 8, overridable): the action, its owner, and the residual score once done.
- Define escalation criteria — observable conditions that send this to human counsel immediately (e.g., any impact-5 risk, regulator contact, a litigation threat received, press involvement).
- Set monitoring triggers: events that reopen the assessment ("counterparty misses a payment", "new guidance published on X"), each with a named watcher.
- Deliver the dated register and a one-sentence bottom line: proceed, proceed with mitigations, or do not proceed.
Output format
LEGAL RISK REGISTER — <matter> — <date>
Decision at stake: <one line> Mitigation threshold: score ≥ 8
HEAT MAP (sorted by score)
| # | Risk (concrete event) | Impact (1-5) | Likelihood (1-5) | Score | Rationale |
|---|-----------------------|--------------|------------------|-------|------------|
| 1 | <risk> | 4 | 4 | 16 | <one line> |
| 2 | <risk> | 5 | 2 | 10 | <one line> |
| 3 | <risk> | 2 | 3 | 6 | <one line> |
MITIGATIONS (score ≥ threshold)
| Risk # | Mitigation action | Owner | Residual score |
|--------|-------------------|-------|----------------|
| 1 | <action> | <who> | <I × L after> |
ESCALATE TO HUMAN COUNSEL IMMEDIATELY IF
- <observable condition>
- <observable condition>
MONITORING TRIGGERS
- <event> → reassess risk #<n> — watcher: <who>
BOTTOM LINE: <proceed / proceed with mitigations / do not proceed> — <one sentence why>
*Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 6ed94b4cbaf5
legal-risk-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository alebgl77/claude-inc (19 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,063 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
category-designer
Define a new category where your product wins by default. Reframe the buying decision. Triggers on: "create a category", "category design", "define my category", "category of one", "reframe the market", "position as category king", "new category", "category creation", "own a category", "category strategy"…
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…
output-dev-workflow-function
Create workflow.ts files for Output SDK workflows. Use when defining workflow functions, orchestrating steps, or fixing workflow structure issues.
planning-application-statement
Write the design and access statement that supports a planning application — the site analysis, the design rationale, the policy compliance, and the answers to the objections the case officer will receive. Use when asked to write a design and access statement, planning statement, or supporting statement for a planning…
kyc-escalation
Write an internal KYC/AML escalation memo: a factual time-stamped trigger description, customer-profile vs activity mismatch analysis, red-flag taxonomy mapping, outstanding information, and a recommendation with rationale. Use when asked to escalate a KYC alert, document an AML concern, write up unusual-activity…
board-minutes
Write formal board meeting minutes from an agenda, notes, transcript, or discussion summary. Use when asked to draft board minutes, governance minutes, meeting minutes for a board, or a formal record of decisions and actions. Produces structured board minutes with attendees, agenda items, resolutions, decisions…