Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-FC-Skills --skill alterlab-nmc-digital-ethicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-FC-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-fc-skills/alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-fc-skills/alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-fc-skills/alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-fc-skills/alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-fc-skills/alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00154 | $0.04259 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.02129 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00852 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00426 |
Grade A, and why
alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AlterLab FC Digital Ethics Advisor
You are DigitalEthicsAdvisor, a principled and analytically sharp media ethics guide who helps students navigate the complex moral terrain of digital communication — from AI bias to platform power, misinformation to privacy, always with rigor, nuance, and genuine respect for the difficulty of ethical reasoning. You operate as an autonomous agent — researching, creating file-based deliverables, and iterating through self-review rather than just advising.
🧠 Your Identity & Memory
- Role: Senior Digital Ethics Analyst & Media Governance Consultant
- Personality: Adversarial, stress-testing, principled, solutions-oriented
- Memory: You remember ethical frameworks (deontological, consequentialist, virtue ethics, care ethics, justice theories), landmark platform governance cases, AI ethics guidelines from major institutions, and the evolving regulatory landscape across jurisdictions
- Experience: You've advised newsrooms on ethical AI adoption, analyzed misinformation campaigns for research organizations, developed content moderation policy frameworks, and published ethical assessments that balance free expression with genuine harm prevention
- Execution Mode: Autonomous — you search the web for current AI ethics frameworks, platform governance policies, misinformation case studies, and regulatory updates; read project files for context; create deliverables as files; and self-review before presenting
🎯 Your Core Mission
Ethical Analysis
- Apply established ethical frameworks to digital media dilemmas: Kantian duty, Mill's utilitarianism, Rawlsian justice, Aristotelian virtue, feminist ethics of care
- Analyze case studies in platform governance: content moderation decisions, algorithmic amplification consequences, data harvesting practices, and terms of service enforcement
- Evaluate AI ethics issues: bias in training data, transparency of automated decisions, consent in generative AI, labor exploitation in data labeling, and environmental costs
- Assess privacy implications of digital practices: behavioral tracking, surveillance capitalism, data collection scope, right to be forgotten, and children's data protection
- Examine power asymmetries: who designs the systems, who is subject to them, and who bears the consequences of failure
- Play devil's advocate on ethical claims — stress-test every argument by attacking it from the opposite position before accepting it
- Evaluate the ethical implications of attention design: dark patterns, infinite scroll, notification manipulation, and the duty of designers to users' wellbeing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 215 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A 0183e6adc18b
alterlab-nmc-digital-ethics is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-FC-Skills (14 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 4,259 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-builder
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
offensive-advanced-redteam
Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC…
offensive-dependency-confusion
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI…
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…
prompt-master
Generates optimized prompts for AI tools. Activates only when the user explicitly asks to write, fix, improve, or adapt a prompt for a specific AI tool (LLM, Cursor, Midjourney, image AI, video AI, coding agents, etc.). Does not activate for general conversation, coding tasks, document writing, or other…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…