Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to amiable-dev/llm-council. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/amiable-dev/llm-council/master/.github/skills/council-gate/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amiable-dev/llm-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amiable-dev/llm-council/council-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amiable-dev/llm-council/council-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amiable-dev/llm-council/council-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amiable-dev/llm-council/council-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amiable-dev/llm-council/council-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01110 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00555 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
council-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Council Gate Skill
Automated quality gate using multi-model consensus for CI/CD pipelines.
When to Use
- Add AI-powered quality checks to GitHub Actions
- Automate PR approval workflows
- Gate deployments on multi-model verification
- Enforce quality standards in pipelines
Exit Codes
| Code | Verdict | CI/CD Behavior |
|---|---|---|
0 |
PASS | Pipeline continues |
1 |
FAIL | Pipeline fails |
2 |
UNCLEAR | Pipeline pauses for human review |
Transcript Location
All deliberations are saved for audit:
.council/logs/{timestamp}-{hash}/
├── request.json # Input snapshot
├── stage1.json # Model responses
├── stage2.json # Peer reviews
├── stage3.json # Synthesis
└── result.json # Final verdict
GitHub Actions Integration
name: Council Quality Gate
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main, master]
jobs:
council-gate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Install LLM Council
run: pip install 'llm-council-core[http]'
- name: Run Council Gate
env:
OPENROUTER_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}
run: |
llm-council gate \
--snapshot ${{ github.sha }} \
--rubric-focus Security \
--confidence-threshold 0.8
- name: Upload Transcript
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: council-transcript
path: .council/logs/
Configuration
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
confidence_threshold |
0.7 | Minimum confidence for PASS |
rubric_focus |
null | Focus area (Security, Performance) |
timeout |
300s | Maximum execution time |
tier |
balanced | Council tier (quick, balanced, high) |
Output Schema
{
"verdict": "pass",
"confidence": 0.85,
"blocking_issues": [],
"rationale": "All models agreed...",
"exit_code": 0,
"transcript_path": ".council/logs/2025-12-31T...",
"partial": false,
"timeout_fired": false,
"completed_stages": ["stage1", "stage2", "stage3"]
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 147 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 7d174c24621b
council-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository amiable-dev/llm-council (41 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,110 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
live-audit
Audit steam-games-mcp — build/test/lint gate, live MCP tool edge-case sweep (input validation, SteamID64/vanity/appid edge cases, key-gating), and source-level code review. Use when asked to test/audit the published or just-fixed steam-games-mcp package, hunt for bugs/edge cases, or repeat "the same kind of testing as…
review
Assess the blast radius of a change and review a diff — what it touches, what could break, which tests to run, and the prior decisions behind it. Use before a refactor, rename, or signature change, and when reviewing a pull request or your own uncommitted diff.
tool-description-check
Self-check a new or edited MCP tool description/field .describe() text before committing — verify every behavioral claim against live testing or source, check for contradictions with sibling tools, and score against Glama's Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS) rubric. Use whenever a tool description or schema field…
java-best-practices
Java coding best practices. Use when writing or reviewing Java code (17+). Covers modern features, error handling, and patterns.
agentic-actions-auditor
Audit GitHub Actions that run AI agents for prompt injection, unsafe interpolation, sandbox gaps, and permissive actor rules. Use for agentic CI workflows, not general application code review.
debug-ci
Use when CI/CD pipeline fails. Provides systematic diagnosis for lint, type, test, and build failures across Python, TypeScript, Java, Rust, and n8n SDKs.