Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer --skill 2-osp-literaturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/2-osp-literature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/2-osp-literature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/2-osp-literature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/2-osp-literature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/2-osp-literature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
2-osp-literature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/2-osp-literature — Literature Review & Expansion
Runs ONE round of external retrieval per invocation. Three rounds are recommended; the user decides how many to run. After each round it reports what it found and offers both routes: another round, or move on.
Activation
Invoke the osp-literature-review-agent skill.
Inputs — none of these is a gate
phases.summary.status == "completed"and01_structured_summary.mdexists. Without it, read.brain/input/paper.mdand derive the query terms yourself; say in Provenance that you did.- Rounds run in order (1 → 2 → 3) because each strategy builds on the last. How many you run is the user's choice — one round is a valid, thinner corpus, not an error.
Resource notice
⚠️ Each invocation makes ~8-12 API calls across whichever databases this project installed, plus native web search. Expect 1-3 minutes per round.
Round definitions
| # | Anchor | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | sub-domain-anchor |
Search using the paper's stated sub-domain and primary keywords |
| 2 | method-anchor |
Search using the method's name and key technical terms |
| 3 | temporal-expansion |
Filter to last 12 months; include arXiv pre-prints, concurrent submissions |
Opening block (print before the round starts)
Render the opening block exactly as .agents/defaults/phase_block_template.md defines it — that file
holds the rail, the rules and the widths, and is the only place they are written down. This is phase
3 of 7 (literature); the rail carries ◐ while rounds remain. Values:
DOING <the anchor for this round, in one line>
READS .brain/raw/01_structured_summary.md
WRITES .brain/raw/02<a|b|c>_literature_round<N>.md
COST ~1-3 min, ~8-12 searches
Steps
- Read
.brain/session.json.- Determine
next_round = phases.literature.rounds_completed + 1(default 0 → next = 1). - If
next_round > 3, all three recommended rounds are done: consolidate if that has not happened yet, and point at/3-osp-historian. - If any earlier round file is missing, resume from that round instead.
- Determine
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 100 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 766b04210f73
2-osp-literature is a skill published in the GitHub repository amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer (48 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
ara-rigor-reviewer
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject…
eval-design-forensics
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan…
anti-autoresearch
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) →…
baseline-comparison-audit
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent…
experiment-forensics
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope…
proof-derivation-forensics
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation …