3-osp-historian

3-osp-historian is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer. It costs 20 tokens per session (807 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research step that turns retrieved papers into a chronological explanation of how a subfield developed. A subfield is a smaller area within a broader research field.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after literature retrieval to build background for a paper review or research summary.
Why use it?
It helps replace a disconnected list of papers with a timeline showing how ideas and methods changed over time.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it after literature retrieval to build background for a paper review or research summary.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer --skill 3-osp-historian
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 3-osp-historian

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 3-osp-historian

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/3-osp-historian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 807 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00807
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00323
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00081

Measured 22d ago against content hash 5a681538baeb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

3-osp-historian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

extensions/.agents/skills/3-osp-historian/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/3-osp-historian — Sub-Domain Historian

Compresses the retrieved literature into a chronological narrative that mimics a senior researcher's mental model of the sub-domain.

Activation

Invoke the osp-historian-agent skill.

Inputs — none of these is a gate

  • phases.literature.status == "completed" and 02_retrieved_literature.md exists. Without it you have no retrieved corpus, so the narrative rests on your own knowledge alone — which has a cutoff and will miss recent work. Build it anyway, mark the phase's own limits in Provenance, and say plainly in the narrative that no literature was retrieved. Recommend /2-osp-literature once.

Record any skip before you start. The orchestrator is not in the loop when the user runs this command directly, so it falls to you: for every earlier phase still pending, set phases.<name>.status = "skipped" and phases.<name>.skip_reason to their reason, or "user ran /3-osp-historian first". A phase left pending reads as "not reached yet", and the final review cannot tell the difference.

Opening block (print before step 1)

Render the opening block exactly as .agents/defaults/phase_block_template.md defines it — that file holds the rail, the rules and the widths, and it is the only place they are written down. This is phase 4 of 7 (historian); read the rail's state from session.json. Values:

  DOING    build the sub-field's chronological narrative
  READS    .brain/raw/01_structured_summary.md
           .brain/raw/02_retrieved_literature.md
  WRITES   .brain/raw/03_domain_narrative.md
  COST     ~2 min, no external calls

Steps

  1. Read .brain/session.json, .brain/raw/01_structured_summary.md, .brain/raw/02_retrieved_literature.md.
  2. Activate the osp-historian-agent skill.
  3. The skill builds a chronological narrative grouped by inflection points (eras), each characterized by its dominant approach and what triggered the transition out.
  4. The skill places the paper under review in the narrative — same era it claims, or a different one — and identifies its closest precedents.
  5. Write .brain/raw/03_domain_narrative.md.
  6. Update session.json:
    • phases.historian.status = "completed"
    • phases.historian.completed_at = <now>
    • phases.historian.notes = "<N> eras identified; paper placed in era <N>"
    • resume_from = "baseline_scout"

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 22d ago First seen · 69 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 5a681538baeb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

3-osp-historian is a skill published in the GitHub repository amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer (48 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 807 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ara-rigor-reviewer

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject…

Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs · 91 tokens

eval-design-forensics

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan…

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch · 458 tokens

anti-autoresearch

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) →…

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch · 275 tokens

baseline-comparison-audit

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent…

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch · 310 tokens

experiment-forensics

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope…

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch · 237 tokens

proof-derivation-forensics

Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation …

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch · 222 tokens