Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asamassekou10/ship-safe --skill ship-safe-cigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asamassekou10/ship-safeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asamassekou10/ship-safe/ship-safe-ci)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asamassekou10/ship-safe/ship-safe-ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asamassekou10/ship-safe/ship-safe-ci/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asamassekou10/ship-safe/ship-safe-ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asamassekou10/ship-safe/ship-safe-ci.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 14 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 51 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 64 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 72 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 78 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00684 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
ship-safe-ci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship Safe — CI Pipeline Mode
You are helping the user set up Ship Safe as a security gate in their CI/CD pipeline.
Step 1: Run CI scan
npx ship-safe@latest ci $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null
Default: pass/fail based on score >= 75.
Options:
--threshold 60— custom passing score--fail-on critical— only fail on critical findings--fail-on high— fail on critical or high--sarif results.sarif— SARIF output for GitHub Code Scanning--baseline— only check new findings--json— JSON output for custom integrations--no-deps— skip dependency audit
Step 2: Interpret results
The command outputs a compact one-line summary:
[ship-safe] Score: 82/100 (B) | Findings: 12 (0C 3H 9M) | CVEs: 2 | 4.2s
[ship-safe] PASS
Or on failure:
[ship-safe] Score: 58/100 (C) | Findings: 25 (3C 8H 14M) | CVEs: 5 | 6.1s
[ship-safe] FAIL: Score 58 < threshold 75
Exit code 0 = pass, exit code 1 = fail.
Step 3: Help set up CI integration
Based on the user's CI platform, offer to create or update their workflow file:
GitHub Actions
- name: Security Scan
run: npx ship-safe@latest ci . --threshold 75 --sarif results.sarif
- name: Upload SARIF
if: always()
uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
with:
sarif_file: results.sarif
GitLab CI
security-scan:
script:
- npx ship-safe@latest ci . --threshold 75 --json > security-report.json
artifacts:
reports:
sast: security-report.json
Generic CI
npx ship-safe@latest ci . --threshold 75 || exit 1
Step 4: Suggest baseline workflow
If there are many findings:
- Create a baseline:
npx ship-safe baseline . - Use
--baselinein CI to only catch new vulnerabilities - Gradually fix baselined issues over time
Important Notes
- CI mode suppresses all spinners and color for clean log output
- The SARIF file can be uploaded to GitHub Code Scanning for inline PR annotations
- Use
--fail-on criticalfor a gradual rollout — start strict only for critical issues
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 87 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 3ad38570d021
ship-safe-ci is a skill published in the GitHub repository asamassekou10/ship-safe (842 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-review
Security audit focused on OWASP Top 10 — injection, auth flaws, secrets exposure, IDOR, and more. Use when reviewing code for vulnerabilities, before deploying to production, or auditing a new codebase.
security-audit
Audit code and infrastructure for security vulnerabilities. Use when performing security reviews, checking for OWASP Top 10 issues, auditing dependencies, or hardening applications.
critique
Expertise in auditing and fixing repository scripts and GitHub Actions workflows to ensure technical robustness and security.
prowler-ci
Helps with Prowler repository CI and PR gates (GitHub Actions workflows). Trigger: When investigating CI checks failing on a PR, PR title validation, changelog gate/no-changelog label, conflict marker checks, secret scanning, CODEOWNERS/labeler automation, or anything under .github/workflows.
atmos-hooks
Atmos hooks: lifecycle events, hook kinds, command/store/git/security hooks, step/steps hooks, when: conditions, scoping and overrides, toolchain integration, --skip-hooks, and Atmos Pro/local output.
atmos-modernization
Atmos Modernization: migrate deprecated or legacy Atmos patterns to current names, Native CI, Atmos Pro drift detection, dependencies.components, nametemplate, and declared secrets.