vibe-concurrent-test-safety

vibe-concurrent-test-safety is a skill for Claude Code from ash1794/vibe-engineering. It costs 42 tokens per session (649 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checker for race conditions in tests that run work at the same time. It examines shared mock data, asynchronous operations, cleanup order, and shutdown behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when testing goroutines, asynchronous code, servers, daemons, shared mocks, or failures found with a race detector.
Why use it?
Tests can fail intermittently because the test itself accesses shared state unsafely or cleans up while background work is still running.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the vibe-engineering plugin — 33 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when testing goroutines, asynchronous code, servers, daemons, shared mocks, or failures found with a race detector.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-concurrent-test-safety
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install vibe-engineering, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vibe-concurrent-test-safety

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for vibe-concurrent-test-safety

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 649 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.00649
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00260
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00130
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00065

Measured 27d ago against content hash 037799cff1a6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vibe-concurrent-test-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

plugins/vibe-engineering/skills/vibe-concurrent-test-safety/SKILL.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

vibe-concurrent-test-safety

Flaky tests are almost always concurrency bugs in the test, not the code.

When to Use This Skill

  • Writing tests that launch goroutines or async operations
  • Tests use shared mock objects accessed by multiple goroutines
  • Tests that fail intermittently ("flaky")
  • After adding -race flag and getting failures
  • Tests that involve daemon/server startup and shutdown

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • Purely synchronous tests with no concurrency
  • Tests that are already race-free (verified with -race flag)
  • Simple mock-based tests with single-threaded access

Common Concurrency Bugs in Tests

1. Direct Mock State Access

// BAD: Race condition -- mock.Requests accessed while goroutine writes
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, len(mock.Requests)) // RACE!

// GOOD: Thread-safe accessor
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, mock.RequestCount()) // Safe

2. Missing Context Cancellation Before Cleanup

// BAD: Close bus while daemon goroutine still using it
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer bus.Close() // daemon may still be writing!

// GOOD: Cancel context first, wait, then cleanup
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer func() {
    cancel()          // Signal daemon to stop
    <-daemon.Done()   // Wait for it
    bus.Close()        // Now safe
}()

3. Assertions on Timing

// BAD: Relies on timing
go startServer()
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond) // May not be enough
resp := callServer()

// GOOD: Wait for readiness
go startServer()
waitForReady(server) // Poll or use channel
resp := callServer()

Audit Checklist

  • No direct access to shared mock fields (use accessors)
  • Context cancelled before resource cleanup
  • Goroutines joined before test ends (<-done or wg.Wait())
  • No time.Sleep for synchronization (use channels, waitgroups, or polling)
  • Assertions use Eventually or polling for async results
  • Test passes with -race flag
  • Test passes when run 100 times (-count=100)

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 27d ago First seen · 91 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 037799cff1a6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vibe-concurrent-test-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository ash1794/vibe-engineering (165 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

cherry-regression-test

Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · 58 tokens

feature-verify

Feature verification (READ-ONLY, P0-P5). Use when: verifying feature behavior after deployment, validating API responses, diagnosing production issues, post-deploy smoke test. Not for: modifying data (use feature-dev), code review (use codex-review-fast), writing tests (use codex-test-gen), security audit (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 75 tokens

test-review

Test coverage review via Codex exec. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 56 tokens

post-dev-test

Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 55 tokens

pre-pr-audit

Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 95 tokens

test-deep

Context-aware test orchestration. Use when: smart test selection, failure triage, progressive test ladder, test failure analysis. Not for: writing tests (use post-dev-test), reviewing tests (use codex-test-review), generating tests (use codex-test-gen), full manual run (use verify). Output: test results + triage…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 77 tokens