Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-concurrent-test-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-concurrent-test-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00649 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-concurrent-test-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vibe-concurrent-test-safety — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vibe-concurrent-test-safety
Flaky tests are almost always concurrency bugs in the test, not the code.
When to Use This Skill
- Writing tests that launch goroutines or async operations
- Tests use shared mock objects accessed by multiple goroutines
- Tests that fail intermittently ("flaky")
- After adding
-raceflag and getting failures - Tests that involve daemon/server startup and shutdown
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Purely synchronous tests with no concurrency
- Tests that are already race-free (verified with
-raceflag) - Simple mock-based tests with single-threaded access
Common Concurrency Bugs in Tests
1. Direct Mock State Access
// BAD: Race condition -- mock.Requests accessed while goroutine writes
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, len(mock.Requests)) // RACE!
// GOOD: Thread-safe accessor
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, mock.RequestCount()) // Safe
2. Missing Context Cancellation Before Cleanup
// BAD: Close bus while daemon goroutine still using it
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer bus.Close() // daemon may still be writing!
// GOOD: Cancel context first, wait, then cleanup
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer func() {
cancel() // Signal daemon to stop
<-daemon.Done() // Wait for it
bus.Close() // Now safe
}()
3. Assertions on Timing
// BAD: Relies on timing
go startServer()
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond) // May not be enough
resp := callServer()
// GOOD: Wait for readiness
go startServer()
waitForReady(server) // Poll or use channel
resp := callServer()
Audit Checklist
- No direct access to shared mock fields (use accessors)
- Context cancelled before resource cleanup
- Goroutines joined before test ends (
<-doneorwg.Wait()) - No
time.Sleepfor synchronization (use channels, waitgroups, or polling) - Assertions use
Eventuallyor polling for async results - Test passes with
-raceflag - Test passes when run 100 times (
-count=100)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 91 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 037799cff1a6
vibe-concurrent-test-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository ash1794/vibe-engineering (165 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
cherry-regression-test
Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.
feature-verify
Feature verification (READ-ONLY, P0-P5). Use when: verifying feature behavior after deployment, validating API responses, diagnosing production issues, post-deploy smoke test. Not for: modifying data (use feature-dev), code review (use codex-review-fast), writing tests (use codex-test-gen), security audit (use…
test-review
Test coverage review via Codex exec. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.
post-dev-test
Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.
pre-pr-audit
Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…
test-deep
Context-aware test orchestration. Use when: smart test selection, failure triage, progressive test ladder, test failure analysis. Not for: writing tests (use post-dev-test), reviewing tests (use codex-test-review), generating tests (use codex-test-gen), full manual run (use verify). Output: test results + triage…