vibe-concurrent-test-safety

vibe-concurrent-test-safety is a skill for Claude Code from mracal/vibe-engineering. It costs 42 tokens per session (649 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of vibe-concurrent-test-safety, MIT.

A review of tests that use concurrent work, such as goroutines, asynchronous operations, or shared mutable test data. It checks for races, unsafe mock access, and cleanup that happens too early.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when writing or debugging concurrent tests, testing servers or daemons, sharing mocks across workers, or investigating failures found with Go's race detector.
Why use it?
It helps explain and prevent tests that fail intermittently because test code is accessing shared state unsafely or shutting down resources in the wrong order.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it when writing or debugging concurrent tests, testing servers or daemons, sharing mocks across workers, or investigating failures found with Go's race detector.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/concurrent-test-safety
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mracal/vibe-engineering --skill concurrent-test-safety
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mracal/vibe-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vibe-concurrent-test-safety

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/concurrent-test-safety.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/concurrent-test-safety)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/concurrent-test-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/concurrent-test-safety.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 649 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.00649
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00324
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00130
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00065

Measured 8d ago against content hash 037799cff1a6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vibe-concurrent-test-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to vibe-concurrent-test-safety — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/concurrent-test-safety/SKILL.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

vibe-concurrent-test-safety

Flaky tests are almost always concurrency bugs in the test, not the code.

When to Use This Skill

  • Writing tests that launch goroutines or async operations
  • Tests use shared mock objects accessed by multiple goroutines
  • Tests that fail intermittently ("flaky")
  • After adding -race flag and getting failures
  • Tests that involve daemon/server startup and shutdown

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • Purely synchronous tests with no concurrency
  • Tests that are already race-free (verified with -race flag)
  • Simple mock-based tests with single-threaded access

Common Concurrency Bugs in Tests

1. Direct Mock State Access

// BAD: Race condition -- mock.Requests accessed while goroutine writes
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, len(mock.Requests)) // RACE!

// GOOD: Thread-safe accessor
go daemon.Run(ctx)
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
assert.Equal(t, 3, mock.RequestCount()) // Safe

2. Missing Context Cancellation Before Cleanup

// BAD: Close bus while daemon goroutine still using it
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer bus.Close() // daemon may still be writing!

// GOOD: Cancel context first, wait, then cleanup
go daemon.Run(ctx)
defer func() {
    cancel()          // Signal daemon to stop
    <-daemon.Done()   // Wait for it
    bus.Close()        // Now safe
}()

3. Assertions on Timing

// BAD: Relies on timing
go startServer()
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond) // May not be enough
resp := callServer()

// GOOD: Wait for readiness
go startServer()
waitForReady(server) // Poll or use channel
resp := callServer()

Audit Checklist

  • No direct access to shared mock fields (use accessors)
  • Context cancelled before resource cleanup
  • Goroutines joined before test ends (<-done or wg.Wait())
  • No time.Sleep for synchronization (use channels, waitgroups, or polling)
  • Assertions use Eventually or polling for async results
  • Test passes with -race flag
  • Test passes when run 100 times (-count=100)

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 91 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 037799cff1a6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vibe-concurrent-test-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository mracal/vibe-engineering (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to vibe-concurrent-test-safety, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

build-and-runtime-verification

Use when running build, compile, test, launch, or runtime checks and producing a verdict tied to exact commands, exit codes, artifact paths, limitations, and fresh evidence.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 41 tokens

evidence-first-debugging

Use when debugging a crash, lỗi, failing game, tool, build, service, script, or reproducible local code failure requires repro or reproduction, giả thuyết or ranked hypotheses, instrumentation, root-cause isolation, a minimal fix, regression proof, and a regression test.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 63 tokens

load-soak-capacity-verification

Use when servers or online game services need controlled load, soak, concurrency, capacity, saturation, leak, queue, failover, recovery, and scaling verification with baselines and stop conditions; not for client frame budgets.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 52 tokens

platform-device-compatibility-matrix

Use when a game needs a platform and device compatibility matrix across OS, hardware, GPU, memory, resolution, input, network, storefront, certification, test evidence, and support policy; not for store metadata preparation.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 51 tokens

playtest-evidence

Use when planning or reviewing game playtests that need structured scenarios, participant context, observations, reproduction evidence, severity, and honest separation of observed findings from conclusions.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 37 tokens

qa-test-strategy-and-coverage

Use when a game project, milestone, or feature needs a QA test strategy and coverage matrix across risk, test levels, platforms, environments, ownership, automation, regression, evidence, and exit criteria; not for one playtest session.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 55 tokens