Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to auerbachb/claude-code-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/auerbachb/claude-code-config/main/.claude/skills/go-on/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/auerbachb/claude-code-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/auerbachb/claude-code-config/go-on)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auerbachb/claude-code-config/go-on"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auerbachb/claude-code-config/go-on/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auerbachb/claude-code-config/go-on"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auerbachb/claude-code-config/go-on.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 111 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 679 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.22166 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.08866 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.04433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.02217 |
Grade A, and why
go-on scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,043 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Resume the work, whatever stopped it. Step 0 classifies the stoppage from recorded evidence and routes; Steps 0b–10 are the interrupted-review-workflow lane it routes to.
Portable helper resolution (workflow lane)
Resolve every lifecycle helper before entering Steps 0b–10, not before Step 0: classification needs only the stop-state helpers resolved in 0.2, and a resume that just routes to /pause-resume must not be blocked by a missing merge-gate helper it will never call. Inside the workflow lane a missing helper blocks rather than guessing which completed state is safe.
resolve_script() {
local name="$1" candidate
for candidate in \
"$HOME/.claude/skills-worktree/.claude/scripts/$name" \
"$HOME/.claude/scripts/$name" \
".claude/scripts/$name"; do
if [[ -x "$candidate" ]]; then echo "$candidate"; return 0; fi
done
return 1
}
PR_AUTHORSHIP_SH=$(resolve_script pr-authorship.sh || true)
DIFF_SURVIVAL_SH=$(resolve_script diff-survival-check.sh || true)
REVIEWER_OF_SH=$(resolve_script reviewer-of.sh || true)
PR_STATE_SH=$(resolve_script pr-state.sh || true)
REPLY_THREAD_SH=$(resolve_script reply-thread.sh || true)
RESOLVE_REVIEW_THREADS_SH=$(resolve_script resolve-review-threads.sh || true)
MERGE_GATE_SH=$(resolve_script merge-gate.sh || true)
CLEAN_BEHIND_SH=$(resolve_script clean-behind-check.sh || true)
AC_CHECKBOXES_SH=$(resolve_script ac-checkboxes.sh || true)
[[ -n "$PR_AUTHORSHIP_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: pr-authorship.sh not found (checked all three paths) — resume authorship gate unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$DIFF_SURVIVAL_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: diff-survival-check.sh not found (checked all three paths) — rebase survival gate unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$REVIEWER_OF_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: reviewer-of.sh not found (checked all three paths) — reviewer routing unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$PR_STATE_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: pr-state.sh not found (checked all three paths) — PR state unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$REPLY_THREAD_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: reply-thread.sh not found (checked all three paths) — review replies unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$RESOLVE_REVIEW_THREADS_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: resolve-review-threads.sh not found (checked all three paths) — thread resolution unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$MERGE_GATE_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: merge-gate.sh not found (checked all three paths) — merge gate unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$CLEAN_BEHIND_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: clean-behind-check.sh not found (checked all three paths) — clean-BEHIND verification unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -n "$AC_CHECKBOXES_SH" ]] || { echo "ERROR: ac-checkboxes.sh not found (checked all three paths) — acceptance verification unavailable" >&2; exit 1; }
Walk through the full review lifecycle checklist in order. At each step, check if it's already been completed. Stop at the first incomplete step and execute it, then continue to the next step. Keep going until the workflow is complete or a blocking condition is hit.
Output a status line at each step so the user can follow along:
[DONE]— step already completed, moving on[ACTION]— step incomplete, executing now[BLOCKED]— step cannot proceed, reporting why[SKIP]— step not applicable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago Changed 925a28010a08
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines b78f72cbd2f4
- 1mo ago Changed · +428 lines · +12 tokens per session f66ea8c71cb1
- 2mo ago First seen · 605 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 55ab61ad54fc
go-on is a skill published in the GitHub repository auerbachb/claude-code-config (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 22,166 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Review Comment Triage (No-Code-Fix Mode)
A review workflow for sorting existing pull-request comments by severity, status, and next action without changing the code.
OpenSourceManagement
Triages open issues, pull requests and GitHub Discussions across the principal's own open-source repos (the list in Config.md) via the gh CLI, ranks what needs attention with suggested replies, posts edit-in-place marker comments, diffs new Ollama library models against a local model box, and takes a private repo…
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
referee
Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Independently verifies behavioral findings, resolves Skeptic challenges, and calibrates severity and confidence.
output-eval-error-analysis
Systematically review workflow traces to identify failure modes before building evaluators. Use when starting an eval project, after significant pipeline changes, or when production quality drops.
pr-description-writer
Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…