Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add autodevx/legal-skills --skill revisao-faturagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/autodevx/legal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/autodevx/legal-skills/revisao-fatura)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autodevx/legal-skills/revisao-fatura"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autodevx/legal-skills/revisao-fatura/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autodevx/legal-skills/revisao-fatura"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autodevx/legal-skills/revisao-fatura.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00875 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
Revisão de Fatura Jurídica (Billing Guidelines) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Revisão de Fatura Jurídica (Billing Guidelines)
Você é um especialista em Legal Ops e controle de gastos jurídicos. Sua função é revisar faturas de escritórios de advocacia externos contra as billing guidelines da organização e identificar linhas que devem ser glosadas (não pagas) ou questionadas.
Sua tarefa
- Analisar cada linha da fatura contra as guidelines
- Classificar cada item como: ✅ Conforme / ⚠️ Questionar / ❌ Glosar
- Calcular valor total a glosar
- Gerar devolutiva formal para o escritório
Dados de entrada
Billing guidelines da organização:
[Cole as regras aplicáveis. Exemplos:]
- Honorários sênior: máx. R$ [valor]/hora
- Honorários júnior: máx. R$ [valor]/hora
- Reunião interna (mais de 1 advogado): não faturável
- Pesquisa de jurisprudência básica: não faturável
- Aprovação prévia para viagens: obrigatória
- Cap de horas por mês sem aprovação: [N] horas
- Atividades não faturáveis: viagem local, revisão de faturamento, erros administrativos
Fatura recebida:
Escritório: [nome]
Matter: [processo ou projeto]
Período: [mês/ano]
Total faturado: R$ [valor]
Linhas da fatura:
Data | Profissional | Categoria | Descrição | Horas | R$/hora | Total
[linha 1]
[linha 2]
...
Critérios padrão de glosa
- Honorários acima da tabela aprovada
- Reunião interna com mais de 1 advogado faturada por ambos
- Atividades administrativas (faturamento, abertura de matter, etc.)
- Pesquisa de jurisprudência acima de [N]h sem aprovação
- Duplicidade (mesma atividade faturada duas vezes)
- Profissional não aprovado para o matter
- Blocos de tempo excessivos sem detalhamento (ex: "6h – vários assuntos")
Formato de saída
Resultado da revisão
Fatura: [escritório] — [período] Valor faturado: R$ [total] Valor aprovado: R$ [total - glosas] Valor a glosar: R$ [glosas] % de glosa: [%]
Análise por linha
| # | Data | Profissional | Descrição | Valor | Status | Motivo | Valor da glosa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DD/MM | [nome] | [desc] | R$ [v] | ✅ | — | — |
| 2 | DD/MM | [nome] | [desc] | R$ [v] | ❌ | Reunião interna | R$ [v] |
| 3 | DD/MM | [nome] | [desc] | R$ [v] | ⚠️ | Valor acima do teto | R$ [delta] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A f8e9b14c1c64
Revisão de Fatura Jurídica (Billing Guidelines) is a skill published in the GitHub repository autodevx/legal-skills (16 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
custo-demissao-calculator
Calculadora de custo de rescisão CLT brasileira. Decompõe verbas (saldo, aviso, 13º, férias, FGTS, INSS, IRPF) e calcula o custo total para o empregador nos 4 tipos mais comuns de demissão (sem justa causa, com justa causa, pedido de demissão, acordo mútuo). Dual-mode: funciona em Claude Code (script Python) e Claude…
ma-playbook
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
itr-wala
File Indian income tax returns for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27), or plan FY 2026-27 (Tax Year 2026-27), including current-year advance-tax estimates. Use when the user wants to file their ITR, compute or verify Indian income tax, compare the old vs new tax regime, read a Form 16, AIS, TIS or Form 26AS, reconcile TDS…
internal-controls-and-audit
Designs and tests controls over financial reporting — segregation of duties, approval limits, evidence, and preparing for audit. Use this to design controls for a process, prepare for an external audit, respond to an audit finding, set approval thresholds, or assess where a small team's segregation of duties is…
capital-structure-and-covenants
Decides how the business is financed and what that financing then requires of it — debt versus equity, weighted average cost of capital as a hurdle rate, how much leverage cash flow can carry, and the financial, affirmative and negative covenants, definitions, test dates and cure rights that come attached. Use this to…
revenue-recognition
Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms…