Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aveproject/ave. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aveproject/ave/main/.claude/skills/to-prd/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aveproject/aveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aveproject/ave/to-prd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aveproject/ave/to-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aveproject/ave/to-prd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aveproject/ave/to-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aveproject/ave/to-prd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
to-prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
to-prd — ave
For larger work (schema changes, new rule engine, bulk record additions). A single record uses add-ave-record, not a PRD.
Save to docs/agents/prds/. Use when:
- Changing the record schema (affects all records + the scanner)
- Adding a new detection engine category
- A coordinated batch of related AVE records (e.g. a new attack family)
Add field: "Scanner coordination required: yes/no" Schema changes always require scanner coordination.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7e268657024c
to-prd is a skill published in the GitHub repository aveproject/ave (24 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 105 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-inspector
Review AI agent skills before installation using NVIDIA SkillSpector and source-aware semantic review. Use when asked whether a skill or downloaded skill folder is safe, trustworthy, installable, over-permissioned, or malicious.
stock-report
Prepare a read-only availability report from an identified stock snapshot. Use when a task asks whether a stated quantity is available, without reserving or ordering stock.
crossval-harness
Orchestrate a static + dynamic, exploit-validated red-team of an AI agent — read the source to find candidate vulnerable paths, then run the dynamic skills to confirm or refute each one empirically. The arbiter of truth is whether the exploit works, not a model vote. Authorized testing of agents you own or are…
redteam-an-agent
The end-to-end methodology for red-teaming a specific AI agent — adaptively, exploit-validated, and honestly. Read THIS target's own code, stand up a disposable harness, and prove or refute each weakness through a real attacker-reachable entry point. This is the orchestration + discipline that makes a finding…
audit-agent-code
Security-audit an AI agent's OWN framework code for classic appsec vulnerabilities the LLM can't defend — path traversal, command injection, SSRF, fail-open security controls, missing/late auth, unsafe deserialization — especially at the untrusted-input boundaries (channels, file/media handlers, config & skill…
rt6-memory-poisoning
Red-team an AI agent's persistent memory for cross-session prompt injection ("memory poisoning") — does untrusted content the agent processes get written into long-term memory and re-fire in future sessions with no attacker present? Authorized testing of agents you own or are permitted to test.