Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/william2333zz/trustshell/crossval-harnessnpx skills add William2333ZZ/trustshell --skill crossval-harnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/William2333ZZ/trustshellWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/william2333zz/trustshell/crossval-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/william2333zz/trustshell/crossval-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/william2333zz/trustshell/crossval-harness.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00693 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
crossval-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-validation harness · static + dynamic
What this is
The orchestration skill. It runs the two halves and correlates them so you get proven findings and root cause — not a wall of static maybes, and not a break with no explanation.
Authorization & safety — read first
Follow every rule in ../README.md. Authorized target, disposable environment,
no real credentials, harmless markers, no destruction, responsible disclosure. Otherwise stop.
Procedure
- Static triage — where to look. Read the agent's source and flag candidate paths:
untrusted content reaching a dangerous sink, a signature-only guard, a missing check, an
un-sandboxed exec. Map each candidate to a class (RT-1…RT-9). Tooling:
python3 scanner/static_scan.py --source /path/to/agent. A candidate is not a finding. - Dynamic confirmation — what's real. For each candidate, run the matching skill
(
rt1-prompt-injection,rt6-memory-poisoning,rt3-sandbox-escape,rt4-action-gating) against the running agent. A finding is confirmed only when the exploit actually works. - Correlate.
- Confirmed: trace the working exploit back to the exact code path → root cause, blast radius, and where to fix.
- Refuted: a static candidate the dynamic pass couldn't exploit — kill it out loud. A false positive dies to a real attack, not a model vote.
- Grade & report. Each finding carries both the code path and a working exploit, with reproduction. Be fair: note the defenses that held. Disclose to help defenders — the finding and fix, not a weaponized payload.
Why both
A pure code verifier can only guess whether a flaw is real, so it leans on model voting to suppress false positives. A pure red-team knows something broke but not why. Cross-validation gives you the precise, proven root cause — and an empirical arbiter a verifier can't provide.
Output shape (suggested JSON)
{
"target": "<agent + version>",
"environment": "disposable-sandbox",
"confirmed": [{ "class": "RT-6", "path": "file:line", "repro": "...", "severity": "crit" }],
"refuted": [{ "class": "RT-3", "candidate": "file:line", "why_not": "fails closed" }],
"defenses_that_held": ["..."],
"disclosure": "private-to-vendor"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 51 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 754cfed5edb6
crossval-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository William2333ZZ/trustshell (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-inspector
Review AI agent skills before installation using NVIDIA SkillSpector and source-aware semantic review. Use when asked whether a skill or downloaded skill folder is safe, trustworthy, installable, over-permissioned, or malicious.
chef-assistant
Use when cooking or planning meals, troubleshooting recipes, learning culinary techniques.
creative-writing-coach
Helps users with creative writing and storytelling.
personal-assistant
A personalized assistant that remembers your preferences.
onboarding-guide
Guides new users through a friendly onboarding experience.
terraform-deployer
Deploy infrastructure using Terraform.