instruction-engineering

instruction-engineering is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from axiomantic/spellbook. It costs 85 tokens per session (1,808 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for designing and reviewing instructions that guide language models, including prompts, system prompts, and skills.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps craft prompts and skill instructions, structure rules, avoid duplicated guidance, and improve tool descriptions.
Why use it?
It helps make model instructions shorter, clearer, and less likely to be ignored in a long context.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit It helps craft prompts and skill instructions, structure rules, avoid duplicated guidance, and improve tool descriptions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add axiomantic/spellbook --skill instruction-engineering
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/axiomantic/spellbook

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for instruction-engineering

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for instruction-engineering

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/axiomantic/spellbook/instruction-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 85 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,808 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Rogue Agent · line 3
    Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.
    Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00085 $0.01808
Opus 5.5 $0.00034 $0.00723
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00362
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00181

Measured 1mo ago against content hash de8c8cf33c68, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

instruction-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/instruction-engineering/SKILL.md · 170 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 170 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Instruction Engineering

Invariant Principles

  1. Simplicity First: Shortest prompt that achieves the goal. Add complexity only when simplicity fails. Every line must justify its existence.

  2. Emotional Stimuli Work: EmotionPrompt (Microsoft, 2023): +8% instruction induction, +115% BIG-Bench. EP02 = "This is very important to my career." EP06 = "You'd better be sure." NegativePrompt (IJCAI 2024): +12.89% instruction induction. NP = consequences for failure framing.

  3. Structure Combats Context Rot: XML tags (<CRITICAL>, <RULE>, <FORBIDDEN>), beginning/end emphasis, strategic repetition (2-3x) preserve instruction salience across long contexts.

  4. Personas Need Stakes: Bare personas ("act as expert") show mixed results. Persona + emotional stimulus (EP02/EP06/NP) shows highest effectiveness.

  5. Skills Invoke, Not Duplicate: Reference skills via Skill tool. Provide CONTEXT only. Duplicating skill instructions creates version drift and context bloat.

  6. Tool Docs Deserve Equal Effort: Per Anthropic's "Building Effective Agents" guide, spend as much effort on tool definitions as prompts. See /ie-tool-docs.

Inputs

Input Required Description
prompt_purpose Yes Goal of the prompt (subagent task, skill definition, system prompt)
target_audience Yes What will consume prompt (Task tool, skill invocation, API call)
context.task_description Yes What the prompt should accomplish
context.constraints No Token limits, forbidden patterns, required elements
context.existing_prompt No Current prompt to improve (for revision tasks)

Read the full file on GitHub · 170 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 170 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A de8c8cf33c68

Subscribe to this mod's changes

instruction-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository axiomantic/spellbook (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,808 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.