arch-review

arch-review is a skill for Claude Code from babyworm/rtl-agent-team. It costs 35 tokens per session (1,900 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review of implemented RTL, meaning hardware description code, against its architecture and microarchitecture specifications. It examines structural, timing, and quality trade-offs such as area, speed, and power.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for post-RTL architecture sign-off, pre-tapeout reviews, and investigating suspected differences between the specification and implementation.
Why use it?
It can reveal design mismatches that functional tests may not expose before hardware sign-off.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the rtl-agent-team plugin — 97 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks shipped together

Good fit It is for post-RTL architecture sign-off, pre-tapeout reviews, and investigating suspected differences between the specification and implementation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add babyworm/rtl-agent-team --skill arch-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install rtl-agent-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 97 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for arch-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for arch-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/arch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,900 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.01900
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00760
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00380
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00190

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 230658d2e24d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

arch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/arch-review/SKILL.md · 149 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Note: This skill intentionally saves to reviews/phase-2-architecture/ because it re-validates the Phase 2 architecture after RTL implementation. It updates (not replaces) the existing Phase 2 review artifacts with post-RTL findings per Hierarchical Spec Compliance.

<Use_When>

  • RTL implementation is complete and needs architecture sign-off
  • Microarchitecture spec (docs/phase-3-uarch/*.md) exists for comparison
  • Pre-tapeout architecture review gate
  • Suspecting architectural mismatch after late RTL changes </Use_When>

<Do_Not_Use_When>

  • RTL is not yet lint-clean (fix lint first with rtl-lint-check)
  • Only functional bugs need diagnosis (use rtl-bug-repro instead)
  • Architecture changes are also requested (arch-review is READ-ONLY) </Do_Not_Use_When>

<Why_This_Exists> Architecture review catches structural mismatches between spec and implementation that functional tests cannot detect. Three independent reviewers with different focus areas (structure, timing, quality) provide broader coverage than a single pass. </Why_This_Exists>

<Execution_Policy>

  • All three agents run in parallel, READ-ONLY
  • rtl-architect checks spec-to-RTL consistency
  • timing-advisor checks pipeline depth, clock domain structure, timing feasibility
  • rtl-critic checks code quality, maintainability, synthesis-friendliness
  • Findings aggregated into single report — no RTL changes </Execution_Policy>
 ## Feature Coverage Checklist
 | REQ ID | RTL Module | Status |
 |--------|-----------|--------|

 ## Findings
 ### [severity] Finding-N: ...

 ## Verdict
 PASS | FAIL: [reason]
 ```

7. Categorize issues: BLOCKER / WARN / SUGGESTION

  • Any MISSING requirement is automatically a BLOCKER
  • Any PARTIAL requirement is at minimum a WARN

<Tool_Usage>

Bash("mkdir -p reviews/phase-2-architecture")

Task(subagent_type="rtl-agent-team:rtl-architect",
     prompt="READ-ONLY review. (1) Read docs/phase-1-research/iron-requirements.json and check every REQ-NNN item for implementation in rtl/. Produce a Feature Coverage Checklist with per-REQ status: COVERED, PARTIAL, or MISSING. (2) Compare docs/phase-3-uarch/*.md against rtl/. List any spec-RTL mismatches, missing modules, or unspecified additions. Verify port naming follows project convention: i_ prefix for inputs, o_ prefix for outputs, io_ prefix for bidirectional. Save the review result to reviews/phase-2-architecture/architecture-review.md in standard review Markdown format with Date, Reviewer (rtl-architect, timing-advisor, rtl-critic), Upper Spec (docs/phase-1-research/iron-requirements.json, docs/phase-3-uarch/*.md), Verdict, Feature Coverage Checklist table, Findings, and Verdict sections. If the file already exists, update it with the latest review results. Output final verdict: VERDICT: PASS or VERDICT: FAIL — [N] spec violations found.")

Task(subagent_type="rtl-agent-team:timing-advisor",
     prompt="READ-ONLY review. Analyze rtl/ pipeline depth, clock domains ({domain}_clk naming, e.g. sys_clk), and reset strategy ({domain}_rst_n naming, e.g. sys_rst_n). Flag timing feasibility concerns and any clock/reset naming violations.")

Task(subagent_type="rtl-agent-team:rtl-critic",
     prompt="READ-ONLY review. Assess rtl/ code quality: synthesizability, coding style (lowRISC base with project overrides: i_/o_/io_ port prefixes, {domain}_clk/{domain}_rst_n naming, logic only, u_ instance prefix, gen_ generate prefix), maintainability. List issues with severity.")

</Tool_Usage>

Read the full file on GitHub · 149 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 149 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 230658d2e24d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

arch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (61 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,900 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.