contribution-analysis

contribution-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from benchflow-ai/skillsbench. It costs 37 tokens per session (762 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A statistical analysis method that estimates how much different factors explain changes in an outcome, using a breakdown of R². R² is a measure of how much variation a model explains.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to quantify the relative influence of groups of variables on a response and support environmental attribution analysis.
Why use it?
It separates the overall explanatory power of a model into contributions from individual factors, including factors represented by correlated variables.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to quantify the relative influence of groups of variables on a response and support environmental attribution analysis.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis
About the project

SkillsBench is a benchmark for measuring how effectively AI agents use modular skills—folders containing instructions, scripts, and resources—to complete specialized tasks. It helps researchers and developers evaluate both skill quality and agent behavior, including tasks that require combining multiple skills. The catalogue’s skills and instructions are evaluated as part of this workflow.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench · 1,764 stars · on GitHub · skillsbench.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill contribution-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benchflow-ai/skillsbench

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for contribution-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for contribution-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/contribution-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 762 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.00762
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00381
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00152
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00076

Measured 8d ago against content hash ec9531b6b06a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

contribution-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

tasks/lake-warming-attribution/environment/skills/contribution-analysis/SKILL.md · 94 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Contribution Analysis Guide

Overview

Contribution analysis quantifies how much each factor contributes to explaining the variance of a response variable. This skill focuses on R² decomposition method.

Complete Workflow

When you have multiple correlated variables that belong to different categories:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
from factor_analyzer import FactorAnalyzer

# Step 1: Combine ALL variables into one matrix
pca_vars = ['Var1', 'Var2', 'Var3', 'Var4', 'Var5', 'Var6', 'Var7', 'Var8']
X = df[pca_vars].values
y = df['ResponseVariable'].values

# Step 2: Standardize
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X)

# Step 3: Run ONE global PCA on all variables together
fa = FactorAnalyzer(n_factors=4, rotation='varimax')
fa.fit(X_scaled)
scores = fa.transform(X_scaled)

# Step 4: R² decomposition on factor scores
def calc_r2(X, y):
    model = LinearRegression()
    model.fit(X, y)
    y_pred = model.predict(X)
    ss_res = np.sum((y - y_pred) ** 2)
    ss_tot = np.sum((y - np.mean(y)) ** 2)
    return 1 - (ss_res / ss_tot)

full_r2 = calc_r2(scores, y)

# Step 5: Calculate contribution of each factor
contrib_0 = full_r2 - calc_r2(scores[:, [1, 2, 3]], y)
contrib_1 = full_r2 - calc_r2(scores[:, [0, 2, 3]], y)
contrib_2 = full_r2 - calc_r2(scores[:, [0, 1, 3]], y)
contrib_3 = full_r2 - calc_r2(scores[:, [0, 1, 2]], y)

R² Decomposition Method

The contribution of each factor is calculated by comparing the full model R² with the R² when that factor is removed:

Contribution_i = R²_full - R²_without_i

Output Format

contributions = {
    'Category1': contrib_0 * 100,
    'Category2': contrib_1 * 100,
    'Category3': contrib_2 * 100,
    'Category4': contrib_3 * 100
}

dominant = max(contributions, key=contributions.get)
dominant_pct = round(contributions[dominant])

with open('output.csv', 'w') as f:
    f.write('variable,contribution\n')
    f.write(f'{dominant},{dominant_pct}\n')

Read the full file on GitHub · 94 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 94 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ec9531b6b06a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

contribution-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository benchflow-ai/skillsbench (1,764 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.