Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Use `code-verification` patterns to prove security fixes actually work (e.g., curl with malicious input after patching). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Review
CRITICAL: Every security assessment must classify the activity BEFORE providing assistance. If the classification is ambiguous, ask for authorization context.
Activity Classification
Permitted — Assist Freely
- Authorized security testing: Pentesting with explicit scope, red team exercises, bug bounty programs
- Defensive security: Hardening, vulnerability patching, security monitoring, incident response
- CTF challenges: Capture-the-flag competitions and training exercises
- Educational: Explaining attack vectors, demonstrating vulnerabilities in controlled environments, security training materials
- Code review: Identifying vulnerabilities in the user's own code
Forbidden — Refuse
- Destructive techniques: Malware creation, ransomware, wipers
- Denial of service: DoS/DDoS attacks, resource exhaustion against production systems
- Mass targeting: Credential stuffing at scale, spam infrastructure, mass exploitation
- Supply chain compromise: Backdooring dependencies, typosquatting packages, poisoning build pipelines
- Detection evasion for malicious purposes: Obfuscation specifically to evade security controls for unauthorized access
Context Required — Ask Before Assisting
Dual-use security tools and techniques require clear authorization context:
- C2 frameworks (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit)
- Credential testing tools
- Exploit development and proof-of-concept code
- Network scanning and reconnaissance tools
- Reverse engineering and binary analysis
Acceptable contexts: pentesting engagements, CTF competitions, security research, defensive use cases. If the user hasn't established context, ask: "What's the authorization context for this? (e.g., pentest engagement, CTF, security research)"
Code Security Checklist
When reviewing code for security, check these categories systematically:
Input Validation & Injection
- SQL injection: Parameterized queries, not string concatenation
- Command injection: No user input in shell commands without sanitization; prefer APIs over
exec/spawnwith user data - XSS: Output encoding for HTML contexts; Content Security Policy headers
- Path traversal: Validate and canonicalize file paths; reject
../sequences - Template injection: No user input in template strings evaluated server-side
- Deserialization: No untrusted data in
eval(),pickle.loads(),JSON.parse()of unvalidated input used to construct objects
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 126 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 5b80f7a2f9d8
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bhaumikmaan/claude-code-master-skills (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,445 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
happiness-skill
A Chinese-language guide to happiness based on reducing unmet wants, focusing on the present, and treating happiness as a trainable skill.
setup-matt-pocock-skills
A setup skill that configures engineering skills for a repository, including its issue tracker, labels, and documentation layout. A repository is the project folder managed by version control.
frontend-design
A design guide for building polished web interfaces such as pages, dashboards, forms, navigation, and reusable UI components. It covers HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and common frontend frameworks.
alterlab-cobrapy
Build and analyze genome-scale constraint-based metabolic models with COBRApy — flux balance analysis (FBA), flux variability analysis (FVA), gene and reaction knockouts, flux sampling, and SBML model I/O. Use when simulating metabolic networks, predicting growth or knockout phenotypes, or running systems-biology and…
alterlab-depmap
Query the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) for cancer cell line gene dependency scores (CRISPR Chronos), drug sensitivity data, and gene effect profiles. Use when identifying cancer-specific genetic vulnerabilities, finding synthetic lethal interactions, checking whether a gene is essential in given cell lines, or…
alterlab-syllabus-ai-policy
Drafts course-level generative-AI use policies and syllabus statements: assigns each graded task a permitted/restricted/prohibited tier (modeled on Cornell's prohibit/allow-with-attribution/encourage framework), writes the disclosure clause with a verbatim APA (OpenAI, 2023) or MLA Works Cited citation template for…