Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup --skill flow.implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup/flow.implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup/flow.implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup/flow.implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup/flow.implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup/flow.implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.02549 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01020 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00510 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
flow.implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 341 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Critical Rules
- NEVER edit tasks.md directly to mark tasks complete - use
specflow mark T### - NEVER edit
.specflow/orchestration-state.jsondirectly - usespecflow state set - TDD by default: Write tests first, then implement (use
--no-tddto skip) - Use
specflowdirectly, NOTnpx specflow- It's a local CLI, not an npm package
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Arguments
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
| (empty) | Execute all tasks with TDD workflow |
--no-tdd |
Skip test-first approach (not recommended) |
continue |
Resume from last incomplete task |
Prerequisites
| Requirement | Check Command | If Missing |
|---|---|---|
| Design gate passed | specflow check --gate design |
Run /flow.design |
| tasks.md exists | specflow status --json → context.hasTasks |
Run /flow.design |
| Constitution | .specify/memory/constitution.md |
Run /flow.init |
| Git branch | git branch --show-current |
Should be on phase branch |
Execution
1. Initialize
Create todo list immediately (use TodoWrite):
- [IMPL] INITIALIZE - Verify design gate and load context
- [IMPL] EXECUTE - Implement all tasks from tasks.md
- [IMPL] COMPLETE - Verify implementation gate
Set [IMPL] INITIALIZE to in_progress.
specflow status --json
Parse response:
context.featureDir→ FEATURE_DIR (abort if null)context.hasTasks→ must be trueprogress.tasksTotal→ verify tasks exist
specflow check --gate design
Abort if gate fails - instruct user to run /flow.design first.
Update state (respecting orchestrate ownership):
CURRENT_STEP=$(specflow state get orchestration.step.current 2>/dev/null)
# Only set step.current if not already set (standalone mode)
# Orchestrate owns step transitions - sub-commands only update status
if [[ -z "$CURRENT_STEP" || "$CURRENT_STEP" == "null" ]]; then
specflow state set orchestration.step.current=implement orchestration.step.index=2
fi
specflow state set orchestration.step.status=in_progress
# Initialize implementation domain (for progress tracking/compaction recovery)
specflow state set orchestration.implement.started_at=$(date -Iseconds)
specflow state set orchestration.implement.current_section=""
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 341 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A cc6b5b770258
flow.implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository billbuchanan-code/claude-code-power-setup (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,549 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…