Biome is a web-development toolchain that formats and checks source code for languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, and CSS. Developers use its command-line and language-server interfaces to maintain code quality in web projects. Catalogue add-ons extend workflows around the toolchain.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to biomejs/biome. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/biomejs/biome/main/.claude/skills/biome-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/biomejs/biomeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/biomejs/biome/biome-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/biomejs/biome/biome-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biomejs/biome/biome-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02281 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00456 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
biome-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Biome Code Review
Review changes read-only against business requirements and applicable behavioral, architectural, and subsystem constraints.
Invocation
Delegate completed reviews to a fresh subagent when available. Supply only:
- the review scope;
- the intended business requirements, including constraints the repository cannot establish.
To avoid bias, omit implementation details, suspected defects, priority files, prior findings, and expected review outcomes.
Review subagents must not delegate again. Without subagents, review the complete scope directly.
Treat delegated findings as candidates; the parent must validate them before confirming or acting.
Safety Boundary
Reviewers and validating parents must preserve the worktree. Authorized implementation follows validation, outside this skill.
- Do not create, edit, move, or delete files.
- Do not run project code, builds, tests, formatters, linters, codegen, benchmarks, package managers, LSPs, or daemons.
- Do not run mutating Git or GitHub commands except the single base-branch fetch allowed below.
- Do not use shell pipelines, scripts,
sed, orawkto inspect source. Use file reads, globs, and text search.
Shell is limited to these review commands:
git fetch origin <main|next>
git status --short --branch --untracked-files=all
git branch --show-current
git rev-parse ...
git merge-base ...
git --no-pager diff --no-ext-diff --no-textconv ...
git --no-pager show --no-ext-diff --no-textconv ...
git --no-pager log ...
git ls-files ...
gh pr view <number> [--json ...]
gh pr diff <number>
gh issue view <number> [--json ...]
One fetch of the resolved base is allowed. If it fails, continue with the local remote-tracking branch and disclose that it may be stale. Documentation lookups are allowed only when checked-out source cannot settle an external language or API contract.
Establish Scope
Use the supplied PR, range, diff, files, or base; exclude unrelated worktree changes.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +21 lines · -12 tokens per session b1c04d6c0914
- 8d ago First seen · 167 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A c6e877cf5082
biome-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository biomejs/biome (25,730 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,281 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Biome
Biome 2.x — fast all-in-one web toolchain in Rust. Formats, lints, assists. Replaces Prettier + ESLint.
prettier-docs
Prettier 3.9.5 — opinionated code formatter. CLI, API, config, plugins, editor integration, CI.
performance-lint-rules
Performance review guidance for Oxc linter rule implementations. Use only when reviewing Rust rule code under crates/oxclinter/src/rules/ or when explicitly auditing those rules for performance improvements.
ruff-docs
Ruff — fast Python linter and formatter in Rust. 900+ rules, Black-compatible formatter, LSP, CI/CD.
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/prisma and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.