lonely-watcher

lonely-watcher is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from bleedmode/dearuser. It costs 7 tokens per session (22 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A watcher that observes something and performs actions, but the input does not say what it watches or what it does.

In plain words
What is it for?
The available details are insufficient to name a concrete job for this add-on.
Why use it?
The description is too vague to identify a specific problem it removes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bleedmode/dearuser/lonely-watcher
Any agent
npx skills add bleedmode/dearuser --skill lonely-watcher
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bleedmode/dearuser

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for lonely-watcher

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bleedmode/dearuser/lonely-watcher.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bleedmode/dearuser/lonely-watcher)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bleedmode/dearuser/lonely-watcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bleedmode/dearuser/lonely-watcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 22 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00007 $0.00022
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00011
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00004
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00002

Measured 3d ago against content hash ad9d894003cf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lonely-watcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

research/calibration/2026-04-22-health-score-validation/fixtures/06-orphan-effect-task/.claude/scheduled-tasks/lonely-watcher/SKILL.md · 7 lines

What it actually says

Just watches. Does stuff. No details.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 7 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A ad9d894003cf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lonely-watcher is a skill published in the GitHub repository bleedmode/dearuser (0 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 22 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.