Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to blueman82/ai-counsel. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/blueman82/ai-counsel/main/.claude/skills/deliberation-tester/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blueman82/ai-counselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueman82/ai-counsel/deliberation-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueman82/ai-counsel/deliberation-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blueman82/ai-counsel/deliberation-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueman82/ai-counsel/deliberation-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blueman82/ai-counsel/deliberation-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.05205 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00521 |
Grade A, and why
deliberation-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 777 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deliberation Tester Skill
Purpose
This skill teaches Test-Driven Development (TDD) patterns for the AI Counsel deliberation system. Follow the red-green-refactor cycle: write failing test first, implement feature, verify passing, then refactor.
When to Use This Skill
- Adding new CLI or HTTP adapters
- Implementing deliberation engine features
- Building convergence detection logic
- Adding decision graph functionality
- Extending voting or transcript systems
- Any feature that affects multi-round deliberations
Test Organization
The project has 113+ tests organized into three categories:
tests/
├── unit/ # Fast tests with mocked dependencies
├── integration/ # Tests with real CLI tools or system integration
├── e2e/ # End-to-end tests with real API calls (slow, expensive)
├── conftest.py # Shared pytest fixtures
└── fixtures/
└── vcr_cassettes/ # Recorded HTTP responses for replay
TDD Workflow
1. Write Test First (RED)
Before implementing any feature, write a test that will fail:
# tests/unit/test_new_feature.py
import pytest
from my_module import NewFeature
class TestNewFeature:
"""Tests for NewFeature."""
def test_feature_does_something(self):
"""Test that feature performs expected behavior."""
feature = NewFeature()
result = feature.do_something()
assert result == "expected output"
Run the test to verify it fails:
pytest tests/unit/test_new_feature.py -v
2. Implement Feature (GREEN)
Write minimal code to make the test pass:
# my_module.py
class NewFeature:
def do_something(self):
return "expected output"
Run the test to verify it passes:
pytest tests/unit/test_new_feature.py -v
3. Refactor (REFACTOR)
Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
- Extract duplicated logic
- Improve naming
- Optimize performance
- Add type hints
Run all tests to ensure nothing broke:
pytest tests/unit -v
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 777 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A c859fcfa2047
deliberation-tester is a skill published in the GitHub repository blueman82/ai-counsel (1 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 5,205 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
deliberation-tester compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deliberation-testerblueman82/ai-counsel | Skill | 1 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| engram-testing-coverageGentleman-Programming/engram | Skill | 7.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |
| principle-test-behavior-not-implementationmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Skill | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| tddcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit | Skill | 805 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| nw-ddd-eventsourcingnWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 631 | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| nw-fp-clojurenWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 631 | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| nw-leanux-methodologynWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 631 | yesterday | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |