Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BlueprintOS/analysis-to-delivery --skill ask-deliverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BlueprintOS/analysis-to-deliveryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueprintos/analysis-to-delivery/ask-delivery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueprintos/analysis-to-delivery/ask-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blueprintos/analysis-to-delivery/ask-delivery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blueprintos/analysis-to-delivery/ask-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blueprintos/analysis-to-delivery/ask-delivery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00497 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
ask-delivery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ask Delivery — 路由
Contract
- 输入: 用户目标,或不确定该用哪个 analysis-to-delivery skill
- 输出: 推荐的下一个 skill 名;若需要则附 1-2 个澄清问题
- 门控: 无
- Required rules: 无
- Required paths: 无
- 下一步: 选中的 skill 或
/analysis-delivery-workflow
我该用哪个 skill?
告诉我你想做什么,我从下面选一个:
| 你想做的事 | 用这个 skill |
|---|---|
| 首次给新项目接这套工作流 | /setup-analysis-delivery |
| 澄清一个需求 / 拉齐字段 | /grill-task |
| 出一份业务需求文档 (BRD) | /to-brd |
| 做合规评审 (GSP/HIPAA/SOX/...) | /compliance-review |
| 写测试用例 / 验收标准 | /test-case-design |
| 出一份产品需求文档 (PRD) | /to-prd |
| 出 FSD + 数据模型 + 开发设计 | /dev-design |
| 跑 QA 审计 | /qa-audit |
| 收尾生成交接文档 | /handoff |
| 走完整 9 阶段(新手/复杂项目) | /analysis-delivery-workflow |
| 进入开发实施子流程 | /using-superpowers |
不确定?
用 /analysis-delivery-workflow — 它会按顺序自动调上面 9 个动作。
设计完成后,用 /using-superpowers 进入 superpowers 5 步实施。
路由方式
我会问你 1-2 个澄清问题,然后告诉你用哪个。如果你已经知道,直接 /skill-name。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 46 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A d9729a2c68e0
ask-delivery is a skill published in the GitHub repository BlueprintOS/analysis-to-delivery (26 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 497 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
incident-response
Manage active production incidents through detection, triage, mitigation, communication, and resolution with structured roles and decision-making. Use this skill whenever the user has an active incident, a production issue, a service outage, a security incident, or needs to plan incident response procedures. Triggers…
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.