Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/paper-reviewnpx skills add borgr/paper-sharpener --skill paper-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borgr/paper-sharpenerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/paper-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/paper-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00171 | $0.08019 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.04009 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01604 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00802 |
Grade A, and why
paper-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 720 lines · 171 tokens per session scan A b092cb23f048
paper-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository borgr/paper-sharpener (10 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 8,019 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
enhancing-latex-lectures
Enhances LaTeX lecture notes by analyzing pedagogical reference materials (like Todorov's PDFs) and systematically adding stunning visualizations, concrete examples, and intuitive explanations. Use when the user requests improving lectures, adding visualizations from papers, or adopting another author's teaching style.
paper-companion
Structured academic paper reading guide using a four-stage protocol: Structural Scan → Core Findings → Critical Evaluation → Reading Note. Use this skill whenever a user uploads a PDF of an academic paper, or says things like "let's read this paper", "help me with this article", "walk me through this study", "Paper…
DeepTutor
Skill "DeepTutor" from HKUDS/DeepTutor, covering deeptutor cli skill, when to use, prerequisites, commands and chat & capabilities.
respond-to-eval
Turn student course evaluations (free-text + numeric) into an actionable teaching-improvement plan — the teaching analogue of /respond-to-referees. Clusters comments into themes, separates signal from noise, classifies each theme Keep / Change / Investigate / Out-of-scope, and drafts concrete changes mapped to the…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
scaffold-exercises
Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key"…