Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add borgr/paper-sharpener --skill self-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borgr/paper-sharpenerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/self-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/self-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/self-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/self-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borgr/paper-sharpener/self-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.02100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.01050 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00420 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00210 |
Grade A, and why
self-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
39 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/CHECKS_API.md 4.2 KB
- references/COVERAGE.md 2.9 KB
- references/family_claim-calibration.md 35 KB
- references/family_cohesion.md 24 KB
- references/family_evidence-surface_A.md 37 KB
- references/family_evidence-surface_B.md 26 KB
- references/family_integrity.md 39 KB
- references/family_naming-notation.md 28 KB
- references/family_process.md 18 KB
- references/family_register-redundancy.md 21 KB
- references/family_sentence-mechanics.md 24 KB
- references/ledger.jsonl 967 KB
- references/README.md 4.6 KB
- references/SUMMARY.md 6.6 KB
- tools/__pycache__/check.cpython-310.pyc 11 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_claim_calibration.cpython-310.pyc 70 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_cohesion.cpython-310.pyc 71 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_evidence_surface.cpython-310.pyc 63 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_integrity.cpython-310.pyc 73 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_naming_notation.cpython-310.pyc 66 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_register_redundancy.cpython-310.pyc 69 KB
- tools/__pycache__/checks_sentence_mechanics.cpython-310.pyc 19 KB
- tools/__pycache__/claimguard.cpython-310.pyc 3.3 KB
- tools/__pycache__/docset.cpython-310.pyc 5.3 KB
- tools/__pycache__/extract.cpython-310.pyc 11 KB
- tools/annotate.py 12 KB runs code
- tools/check.py 14 KB runs code
- tools/checks_claim_calibration.py 88 KB runs code
- tools/checks_cohesion.py 81 KB runs code
- tools/checks_evidence_surface.py 74 KB runs code
- tools/checks_integrity.py 83 KB runs code
- tools/checks_naming_notation.py 75 KB runs code
- tools/checks_register_redundancy.py 80 KB runs code
- tools/checks_sentence_mechanics.py 22 KB runs code
- tools/claimguard.py 3.7 KB runs code
- tools/docset.py 4.4 KB runs code
- tools/extract.py 13 KB runs code
- tools/run.py 14 KB runs code
- tools/teach.py 3.9 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 176 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A ac8a372dea03
self-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository borgr/paper-sharpener (10 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 2,100 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper-composer
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready…
academic-paper-strategist
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4)…
tikz-figure-review
Review and fix alignment, label collision, clipping, legend-over-data, overlap, and layout issues in TikZ and pgfplots figures inside LaTeX documents. Use when the user wants to review figures in a paper, tutorial, lecture notes, or thesis before submission; when a reviewer flags figure problems; when a rendered…
animating-computational-mechanics
Animate continuum mechanics, tensor calculus, and finite element concepts — deformation gradients, polar decomposition, Cauchy/Piola–Kirchhoff stresses, weak form, mesh convergence — using Matplotlib (FuncAnimation), Manim (ValueTracker / applyfunction / Transform), or Blender (bpy + ParaView .obj pipeline). Use when…
refining-ml-papers
Refines ML/scientific LaTeX papers based on reviewer or advisor feedback. Handles structural reorganization (moving problem statements, merging sections), concrete instantiations of abstract tables, cross-file deduplication, and compilation verification. Use when the user requests paper revisions, addresses reviewer…
rigorous-paper-reviewer
Review a LaTeX research paper for mathematical rigor, notation consistency, proof obligations, numerical-analysis discipline, complexity claims, convergence/error bounds, figure quality, reader-state flow, cross-references, and global coherence. Use when the user wants a deep technical review or verification pass on a…