Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00501 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Research Skill
Explore the codebase without polluting your main context.
When to use
- Need to understand how a module works before changing it
- Need to find where a pattern is used across the codebase
- Need to trace a call path end-to-end
- Need to gather evidence before proposing a plan
Protocol
Option A — Spawn an explorer subagent (recommended)
"Spawn an explorer subagent to [describe the research goal]. Return a structured summary with: files examined, relevant symbols, call path trace, and key findings."
The explorer runs in read-only mode in isolated context — your main thread stays clean.
Option B — Inline research (for quick lookups)
Find files matching a pattern
find . -name '*.ts' -path '*/auth/*' | head -20
Search for symbol usage
grep -rn --color=never 'functionName' --include='*.ts' . | head -30
Trace a call path
# 1. Find where the function is defined
grep -rn --color=never 'def functionName\|function functionName\|functionName =' . | head -10
# 2. Find all callers
grep -rn --color=never 'functionName(' . | grep -v 'def functionName\|function functionName' | head -20
Read a specific file section
Use file reading tools — do NOT cat the whole file.
Research Output Format
After research, summarize findings:
## Research Summary: <topic>
### Files examined
- path/to/file.ts — reason
### Key symbols found
- SymbolName (file:line) — what it does
### Call path trace
Entry → ServiceA.method → ServiceB.method → DB query
### Key findings
1. Finding 1
2. Finding 2
### Open questions
- ?
Rules
- Keep research scope tight — stop when you have enough evidence
- Do NOT modify files during research
- Save verbose intermediate output to
claude/tasks/research-notes.md(not in main context)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8187865ce744
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 501 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
TRIGGER when: user asks to implement, fix, build, or work on something — whether from a docs/feat/wip plan OR a standalone task (bug fix, GitHub issue, one-off change). Examples: "work on task 1", "fix this bug", "implement feature X from the issue". Provides structured execution with profile detection, dependency…
review-spec
Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.
chain-of-verification
Apply Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) prompting to improve response accuracy through self-verification. Use when complex questions require fact-checking, technical accuracy, or multi-step reasoning.
review-design
Review design, implementation, and task documents produced by design. Evaluates document quality, internal consistency, and technical soundness. Use after design completes and before starting implement.
review-architecture
Review a written architecture artifact — an ADR (docs/adr/), a broader architecture doc, the architecture section of a design doc, or a domain-reference kit (glossary + traps pages, reviewed as one composite artifact) — against the system it claims to describe. Verifies the EXISTENCE and TOPOLOGY of declared…
model
Produce or update a domain-reference kit — the durable glossary + divergences/traps pages for a bounded context. Use for domain modelling, information architecture, building a domain glossary or domain model, mapping domain concepts to code (bindings), or surfacing the decidable questions stakeholders must close…