ase-review-process

ase-review-process is a skill for Claude Code from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. It costs 81 tokens per session (1,436 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An explanation of how ASE reviews research submissions. It covers double-anonymous review, an early rejection stage, rebuttal, and a possible Revision outcome rather than only accept or reject.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare an anonymous submission, assess reviewer feedback, decide whether a rebuttal is useful, and plan for criteria-bound revisions or artifact evaluation.
Why use it?
Understanding the sequence helps authors interpret reviews and focus their response on issues that can still change the decision. Double-anonymous review means reviewers do not see the authors' identities.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the ase-skills plugin — 12 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to prepare an anonymous submission, assess reviewer feedback, decide whether a rebuttal is useful, and plan for criteria-bound revisions or artifact evaluation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process
About the project

Awesome Journal Skills is a collection of agent skill packs tailored to hundreds of academic journals across fields including economics, social science, medicine, science, and engineering. Researchers use the packs for tasks such as choosing topics, designing empirical strategies, preparing tables and figures, submitting papers, and responding to reviewers. The catalogue entries are the project's journal-specific skills and related plugins.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 1,289 stars · on GitHub · copaper.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-review-process
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ase-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ase-review-process

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ase-review-process

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ase-review-process.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 81 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,436 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00081 $0.01436
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.00574
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00287
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00144

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5fa946b4b116, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ase-review-process scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

ASE-Skills/skills/ase-review-process/SKILL.md · 99 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ASE Review Process

Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. ASE's process has two distinctive gates that authors from a plain accept/reject conference miss: an early-rejection stage that ends the process before rebuttal for the weakest papers, and a first-class Revision outcome whose criteria are fixed in advance. Getting both wrong wastes the little leverage authors have.

Process model

  • Submission and review run on HotCRP with double-anonymous review: identities are hidden from reviewers, and authors reference their own prior work in the third person.
  • Each paper receives multiple reviews scoring the significance and soundness of the automation, the quality of the evaluation on real subjects, threats to validity, clarity, and the Data Availability / artifact posture.
  • Early-rejection stage: papers whose initial scores are uniformly negative are rejected before the rebuttal period. This is a mercy and a filter — it gives those authors a fast answer and concentrates rebuttal effort where it can change an outcome. If your paper survives to rebuttal, at least one reviewer saw something.
  • Rebuttal, then a final outcome of Accept, Revision, or Reject.
  • Revision is criteria-bound: instead of rejecting, reviewers specify concrete, actionable revision criteria and agree to accept the paper in principle if those criteria are met. Authors return a revised paper with a point-by-point summary of changes, re-checked (often by a discussion lead) against the stated criteria.
  • Accepted papers appear in the proceedings in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library; camera-ready compliance and artifact follow-through matter after the verdict.

Reading a decision against the categories

Decision What it means Author move
Accept The automation and its evaluation hold; minor polish only Camera-ready + artifact; do not reopen scope
Revision Repairable gaps captured as explicit criteria: a missing baseline, an ablation, a clarified construct Meet every stated criterion, or justify why one is infeasible; map each to a change in the summary-of-changes
Reject Structural: the automation is unsound, the evaluation is not on real subjects, the delta is thin Reframe or reroute (ICSE/FSE/ISSTA or a journal); do not lightly resubmit unchanged
Early reject (pre-rebuttal) Uniformly negative initial scores No rebuttal opportunity; diagnose honestly and rebuild before any resubmission

Read the full file on GitHub · 99 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 5fa946b4b116

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ase-review-process is a skill published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills (1,289 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,436 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-manager

Use this when starting a new research project or managing a complex, multi-step research workflow.

poemswe/co-researcher · 21 tokens

alterlab-qiime2-amplicon

Runs 16S/ITS amplicon (microbiome) analysis with the QIIME 2 distribution (2026.7; the "amplicon" distribution was renamed "qiime2" in 2026.4) in the correct order: manifest import, cutadapt trim-paired primer removal BEFORE dada2 denoise-paired (trunc-len chosen from the demux quality .qzv), feature-classifier…

AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills · 270 tokens

alterlab-pyhealth

Develops, tests, and validates clinical machine learning models with the PyHealth 2.x healthcare AI toolkit. Use when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, length of stay, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC, CCS), physiological signals…

AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills · 132 tokens

alterlab-citation-verifier

Verifies that every bibliography entry actually exists by cross-checking Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and arXiv (no API key required) plus doi.org DOI registration, fuzzy-matching title and authors (difflib ratio >= 0.70), flagging retractions recorded by Crossref (including Retraction Watch data) or…

AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills · 219 tokens

alterlab-timesfm

Forecasts time series zero-shot with Google's TimesFM foundation models — TimesFM 2.5 (200M, Apache-2.0 weights; ForecastConfig API, XReg covariates) and TimesFM 3.0 (330M, multivariate with native past/future covariates; non-commercial weights) — producing point forecasts and quantile prediction intervals from…

AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills · 150 tokens

alterlab-anndata

Build, slice, concatenate, read, and write AnnData annotated data matrices (obs, var, X, layers, obsm, uns) — the scverse data STRUCTURE, not an analysis pipeline. Use when creating or wrangling .h5ad/zarr files, managing cell and gene annotations, concatenating batches, or handling layers/obsm/backed-mode; for the…

AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills · 133 tokens