Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit --skill seo-content-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-content-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-content-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-content-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-content-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-content-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.02395 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00958 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00479 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
seo-content-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to seo-content-brief — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Content Brief Generator
Generate research-backed content briefs that help writers produce pages capable of outranking current top results. Briefs include competitor analysis with gap scoring, per-section word count breakdowns, keyword placement rules, and page-type-specific templates.
Process
1. Determine Brief Mode
Improve mode (existing page URL provided):
- Fetch the existing page content and structure
- Identify what is already strong (keep it)
- Identify missing, thin, or outdated sections
- Distinguish "keep/strengthen" vs "add new" sections in the outline
- Do not recommend a full rewrite when targeted improvements will win
New page mode (keyword or topic provided, no existing page):
- Use the target site's homepage or sitemap for business context only
- Build the brief from scratch for a new page
- Focus on competitive gaps the new page can fill
2. Fetch Context
- Fetch the target URL or homepage to understand the business
- Fetch the sitemap to discover all existing pages, categories, and services
- This context is critical for the Website Relevance Rule (see below)
3. Analyse SERPs
- Identify the top 5 ranking pages for the target keyword
- Filter out non-competitors (Wikipedia, Reddit, Pinterest, Amazon, YouTube, government sites, SEO tool pages, job boards, directories, news aggregators, social platforms). See
references/excluded-domains.mdfor the full list. - Score each real competitor: Depth (1-10), Formatting (1-10), SEO (1-10), UX (1-10)
- Identify three gap types:
- Topic gaps: subtopics competitors miss entirely
- Depth gaps: topics covered but shallow
- Quality gaps: outdated info, no expert perspective, poor formatting
- Calculate gap priority:
Impact x Competitive Advantage / Effort
4. Classify Search Intent
- Informational: user wants to learn (guides, how-tos, definitions)
- Commercial: user is researching before buying (comparisons, reviews, "best X")
- Transactional: user is ready to act (buy, book, enquire, sign up)
- Navigational: user is looking for a specific site or page
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 248 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 38d5ae2ac467
seo-content-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,395 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to seo-content-brief, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
codeql
Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.
huggingface-vision-trainer
Train object-detection, image-classification, or SAM segmentation models on Hugging Face Jobs. Use for vision fine-tuning and evaluation; use huggingface-llm-trainer for language models.
sharp-edges
Identify error-prone APIs, dangerous configuration, and footgun designs that enable security mistakes. Use for API ergonomics, misuse resistance, secure defaults, or pit-of-success reviews; use code-review for general defects.
code-quality
Agents should invoke this skill for code reviews, linting/formatting setup, maintainability checks, complexity concerns, warning cleanup, coding standards, or quality gates in Rust, TypeScript, Python, shell, and mixed repos.
code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Use this skill when reviewing a small set of changes locally (such as unstaged diff), when dispatched as a…
differential-review
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.