code-quality

code-quality is a skill for Claude Code from waybarrios/opencode-power-pack. It costs 49 tokens per session (1,833 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of code-review and maintenance guidelines for Rust, TypeScript, Python, shell, and mixed codebases. It covers automated checks such as linters, type checkers, formatters, and tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code, configure linting and formatting, check complexity, clean up warnings, and set quality gates before changes are accepted.
Why use it?
It helps find warnings, hard-to-maintain code, excessive complexity, and coding-standard issues in a consistent way. Structured findings make it easier to decide what needs fixing.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the opencode-power-pack plugin — 55 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review code, configure linting and formatting, check complexity, clean up warnings, and set quality gates before changes are accepted.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add waybarrios/opencode-power-pack --skill code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install opencode-power-pack, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 55 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 49 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,833 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 238
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00049 $0.01833
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00733
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00367
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00183

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9751bcf73898, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/code-quality/SKILL.md · 240 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 240 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality

Structured code review and quality enforcement across common tech stacks. Checklists, linting strategies, and metrics to keep codebases healthy.

Quick Start

Run a Code Quality Check

  1. Run static analysis: Linters, type checkers, formatters
  2. Review against checklist: Language-specific items below
  3. Check complexity metrics: Cyclomatic < 25, data flow < 25
  4. Report findings: Structured output with severity and recommendations

Linting Configurations

Rust — Clippy Config

Standard clippy configuration (in Cargo.toml or .clippy.toml):

[lints.clippy]
cognitive_complexity = "warn"
pedantic = { level = "deny", priority = -1 }
nursery = { level = "deny", priority = -1 }
unwrap_used = "deny"

Standard commands:

cargo fmt
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
cargo check
cargo test -- --test-threads=1

Key rules to enforce:

  • No .unwrap() in non-test code (use ? or .expect("reason"))
  • All public items have rustdoc (#[warn(missing_docs)])
  • #[must_use] on functions that return values that should be checked
  • When using #[allow(...)], always add a comment explaining why
  • If no good explanation exists for #[allow(...)], fix the issue instead

TypeScript — ESLint + Strict Mode

Recommended tsconfig.json strictness:

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "strict": true,
    "noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true,
    "noImplicitReturns": true,
    "noFallthroughCasesInSwitch": true,
    "exactOptionalPropertyTypes": true
  }
}

Key rules to enforce:

  • No any — use unknown and type guards instead
  • No // @ts-ignore — fix the type issue or use // @ts-expect-error with explanation
  • Prefer const over let, never use var
  • Use discriminated unions for state modeling
  • Explicit return types on exported functions

Python — Ruff + Mypy

Recommended pyproject.toml:

[tool.ruff]
target-version = "py312"
line-length = 88

[tool.ruff.lint]
select = ["E", "F", "W", "I", "N", "UP", "ANN", "B", "A", "C4", "DTZ", "ISC", "PIE", "PT", "RET", "SIM", "TCH", "ARG", "PTH", "ERA"]

[tool.mypy]
strict = true
warn_return_any = true
warn_unreachable = true

Read the full file on GitHub · 240 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 240 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 9751bcf73898

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository waybarrios/opencode-power-pack (540 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,833 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

cpp-coding-standards

C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.

affaan-m/ECC · 48 tokens

java-rules

Java coding rules: style, patterns, security, testing. Triggers: .java, pom.xml, build.gradle, Spring, Spring Boot, JPA, Hibernate, JUnit, Maven, Gradle.

softspark/ai-toolkit · 46 tokens

coding-best-practices

Reviews Swift/iOS code for adherence to modern Swift idioms, Apple platform best practices, architecture patterns, and code quality standards. Use when user mentions best practices, code review, clean code, refactoring, or wants to improve code quality.

rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills · 55 tokens

coding-standards

Universal coding standards - naming, formatting, error handling, immutability, SOLID principles.

vibeeval/vibecosystem · 23 tokens

go-code-reviewer

Review Go code with a defect-first approach using repository policy (constitution.md first, then AGENTS.md fallback). Use for code review, PR review, quality checks, risk analysis, and regression detection.

johnqtcg/awesome-skills · 45 tokens

go-review-lead

Orchestrate a comprehensive Go code review by triaging code changes, dispatching vertical review skills (security, concurrency, error, logic, performance, quality, test, observability) as parallel agents, then consolidating results into a unified report. Use for full Go PR review or comprehensive code review. Replaces…

johnqtcg/awesome-skills · 80 tokens