Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit --skill seo-technicalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-technical)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-technical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-technical/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-technical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/seo-technical.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01984 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
seo-technical scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-technical — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical SEO Audit
Categories
1. Crawlability
- robots.txt: exists, valid, not blocking important resources
- XML sitemap: exists, referenced in robots.txt, valid format
- Noindex tags: intentional vs accidental
- Crawl depth: important pages within 3 clicks of homepage
- JavaScript rendering: check if critical content requires JS execution
- Crawl budget: for large sites (>10k pages), efficiency matters
AI Crawler Management
As of 2025-2026, AI companies actively crawl the web to train models and power AI search. Managing these crawlers via robots.txt is a critical technical SEO consideration.
Known AI crawlers:
| Crawler | Company | robots.txt token | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | GPTBot |
Model training |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT-User |
Real-time browsing |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | ClaudeBot |
Model training |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | PerplexityBot |
Search index + training |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | Bytespider |
Model training |
| Google-Extended | Google-Extended |
Gemini training (NOT search) | |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | CCBot |
Open dataset |
Key distinctions:
- Blocking
Google-Extendedprevents Gemini training use but does NOT affect Google Search indexing or AI Overviews (those useGooglebot) - Blocking
GPTBotprevents OpenAI training but does NOT prevent ChatGPT from citing your content via browsing (ChatGPT-User) - ~3-5% of websites now use AI-specific robots.txt rules
Example, selective AI crawler blocking:
# Allow search indexing, block AI training crawlers
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: Google-Extended
Disallow: /
User-agent: Bytespider
Disallow: /
# Allow all other crawlers (including Googlebot for search)
User-agent: *
Allow: /
Recommendation: Consider your AI visibility strategy before blocking. Being cited by AI systems drives brand awareness and referral traffic. Cross-reference the seo-geo skill for full AI visibility optimization.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 174 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 33c1e9cc08f0
seo-technical is a skill published in the GitHub repository build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit (4 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,984 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-technical, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hf-cloud-sagemaker-production-defaults
Implement a production SageMaker endpoint with autoscaling, CloudWatch alarms, and tags. Use after the serving image and IAM role are known; use the deployment planner first when architecture is undecided.
codeql
Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.
sarif-parsing
Parses and processes SARIF files from static analysis tools like CodeQL, Semgrep, or other scanners. Triggers on "parse sarif", "read scan results", "aggregate findings", "deduplicate alerts", or "process sarif output". Handles filtering, deduplication, format conversion, and CI/CD integration of SARIF data. Does NOT…
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
agents-md-improver
Audit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate project context. Use when the user asks to check, audit, review, update, improve, or fix their AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, mentions "project rules maintenance" or "agent context optimization", or…
code-review
Review a pull request or a set of code changes for bugs, logic errors, and project-convention violations using a confidence-filtered, multi-agent process. Use this skill when the user asks to review a PR, audit pending changes, or inspect a diff for problems before merging.