Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BuildrAI/Buildr --skill project-composition-maintenancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BuildrAI/BuildrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/project-composition-maintenance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/project-composition-maintenance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildrai/buildr/project-composition-maintenance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/project-composition-maintenance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildrai/buildr/project-composition-maintenance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01086 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
project-composition-maintenance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
项目服务组成梳理与维护
让项目(Project)的登记准确表达哪些服务(Service)共同承担业务目标,并沿已有引用找到代码库实例(Repository Instance)。已有组成图读取同一事实,不另存一份图数据。
判断本次组成变化
先明确目标项目(Project)与实际工作空间(Workspace),读取现有登记及相关业务说明。首次梳理从业务目标、已确认设计、代码和配置核对参与的服务(Service);日常开发只检查本次新增、替换或停用的部分,修改结束后按最终事实复核。
- 以承担的业务职责判断是否加入,不以目录位置、代码扫描结果或某次临时工具使用直接决定组成。已确认采用但尚未编码的组成可以保留;尚在讨论的选项只说明,不登记成已确定事实。
- 优先复用已有服务(Service)身份。基础项目(Project)可以集中组织公共能力,业务只关联实际需要的部分;不复制实现,不要求关联全部公共能力。
- 移除前核对当前业务其他功能是否仍需要它。未扫描到、目录暂不可用或停止一处调用不足以证明整体停用;不确定就保留并说明具体疑问。
用户要求梳理并维护时直接执行;已授权开发中由本次实现引起的必要组成校准一并完成,不逐条重复询问。仅查看或检查时只读;范围外业务及未明确的采用取舍另行确认,不将本次授权扩大为长期全局维护。
保存本地组成
独立运行版(Standalone)的事实在三份本地清单(Manifest):
| 文件 | 读取或维护内容 |
|---|---|
projects/manifest.yml |
指定项目(Project)的 serviceIds |
services/manifest.yml |
全局服务(Service)身份、repositoryId 与 modulePath |
repositories/manifest.yml |
代码库实例(Repository Instance)的身份与来源 |
使用已有本地资产命令保存这些文件,复用版本校验与事务;无需启动网页或服务器。下列 buildr 使用当前环境已确认的产品入口:
buildr assets inspect --target <workspace> --json
buildr assets associate <project-id> --target <workspace> --input <json-file> --json
从 inspect 返回值核对项目(Project)、服务(Service)身份及 revision。在临时 JSON 文件中填写:
{
"revision": "<本次观察到的 revision>",
"serviceIds": ["<该项目保存后完整的服务身份集合>"]
}
associate 替换指定项目(Project)的完整关联集合:在当前 serviceIds 上应用本次有依据的增减,保留其余关联,不能只提交新增项或用扫描结果覆盖整份列表。相同组成不写入。版本冲突时重新读取、判断并合并本次增量,不只替换 revision 后重放旧集合。
确需新增服务(Service)或代码库实例(Repository Instance)时,先检查已有登记和真实目录,按已有 buildr assets service-candidates|repository-candidates、create service|repository 动作及当前帮助完成登记,再使用返回的身份和最新版本关联。仅维护组成不搬迁目录、不切换分支、不创建远端代码库(Repository)。遇到 migrationRequired 时按已有显式迁移方式处理,保留原身份,不靠重建清单(Manifest)绕过迁移。
解除组成仅移除当前项目(Project)的引用,不调用全局删除动作;其他使用方、服务(Service)、代码库实例(Repository Instance)与代码保留。
核对与交付
核对保存返回的关联集合及引用对象,确认增减符合本次判断、原有无关关联仍在。需要查看组成图时打开或刷新现有页面,由它读取同一清单(Manifest);未实际查看页面就不声称已完成页面验证。
简要说明新增、移除或无需变更的组成、业务理由和仍未确定的项。只解释本次范围,不要求额外报告文件。已有说明文档确实失准时按授权交给 current-knowledge-maintenance 校准;它不代替本技能(Skill)写组成登记。
本技能(Skill)在梳理和开发时执行,不持续监听其他入口的修改,不表达服务(Service)间调用或依赖。云端版(Cloud)的保存方式待实际入口可用后再调整。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago First seen · 59 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A a0a082dcc631
project-composition-maintenance is a skill published in the GitHub repository BuildrAI/Buildr (28 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,086 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…