canonical/workshop is a project for creating secure, fast, composable development environments that are ready for coding agents. It is for reproducible container-based development setups. The catalogue entries provide skills, agents, and instructions for working with those environments.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to canonical/workshop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/canonical/workshop/main/.github/skills/documentation-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/canonical/workshopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/canonical/workshop/documentation-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/canonical/workshop/documentation-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/canonical/workshop/documentation-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/canonical/workshop/documentation-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/canonical/workshop/documentation-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01549 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
documentation-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 1f027f2c5ef3
documentation-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository canonical/workshop (123 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,549 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compiler-review
Review Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares against the original TypeScript source.
prowler-compliance-review
Reviews Pull Requests that add or modify compliance frameworks. Trigger: When reviewing PRs with compliance framework changes, CIS/NIST/PCI-DSS additions, or compliance JSON files.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
ln-92-container-engineer
Builds, hardens or reviews container images and local runtime packaging with startup and shutdown evidence; not remote deployment or host administration.
ring:adding-multi-tenancy
Adding database-per-tenant isolation into a Go service end-to-end via an 11-gate cycle: detects the stack, audits compliance, then dispatches backend agents to implement tenantId-from-JWT routing through the lib-commons v5 dispatch layer (config, middleware, repositories, metrics, tests) and runs reviewers. Use when…