enterprise-risk

enterprise-risk is a skill for Claude Code from cbrock84/headcount. It costs 81 tokens per session (806 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for identifying, assessing, assigning, and tracking risks across an organization. A risk register is a written list of risks with their causes, effects, owners, controls, and planned responses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build a risk register, score exposure, assign owners, choose treatments, and prepare for audits or certifications.
Why use it?
It prevents important risks from remaining vague, unowned, or quietly accepted without a recorded decision.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the legal-risk plugin — 8 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to build a risk register, score exposure, assign owners, choose treatments, and prepare for audits or certifications.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk
About the project

headcount is an organization of independently installable Claude Code plugins, each grouping skills for a department such as finance, security, or demand generation. Claude Code users install the departments they need and invoke their skills for specialized work; the catalogue entries are skills and related agent tooling from that organization.

cbrock84/headcount · 2,081 stars · on GitHub · cbrock84.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill enterprise-risk
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install legal-risk, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 8 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for enterprise-risk

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for enterprise-risk

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/enterprise-risk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 81 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 806 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00081 $0.00806
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.00322
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00081

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4d7363c799fe, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

enterprise-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/legal-risk/skills/enterprise-risk/SKILL.md · 80 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Enterprise risk

The register is the artifact

A risk that is not written down with an owner is not managed. Each entry carries:

  • The risk stated as a cause and consequence — "if X happens, then Y." "Cybersecurity" is a category, not a risk. "If an employee's credentials are phished, an attacker reaches customer records" is a risk you can do something about.
  • Likelihood and impact, on a stated scale, with the reasoning. The reasoning matters more than the score.
  • Current controls and an honest view of whether they work.
  • Residual risk after those controls — the number that actually matters and the one most often omitted.
  • A named owner. A person, not a department.
  • Treatment and a date.

Treatment is a decision with four options

Mitigate (reduce it), transfer (insure or contract it away), avoid (do not do the thing), or accept. Accepting is legitimate and often correct — but acceptance must be explicit, at the right level of authority, and recorded. Risk accepted by silence is risk nobody owns.

Anything above the threshold that only the chief executive can accept goes to them. Never let an unacceptable risk be quietly downgraded to fit an existing authority.

Scoring honestly

Two failure modes, both common:

  • Everything is high. The register stops discriminating and gets ignored.
  • Scores drift downward as items age without the underlying exposure changing.

Re-assess on a schedule and require evidence for any reduction. A control's existence is not evidence it works; a test of the control is.

Audit readiness

Continuous, not a project. What auditors need: documented policies, evidence they are followed, records of exceptions and approvals, and a clear line from the framework's requirement to your control to the evidence.

Collect evidence as work happens. Assembling a year of it retrospectively is expensive, and gaps found then cannot be fixed retroactively.

Reporting

Leadership needs the few risks whose residual exposure is above appetite, what is being done, and what needs a decision. Not the whole register. A risk report that requires reading forty rows to find the three that matter will not be read.

Read the full file on GitHub · 80 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 4d7363c799fe
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A cc5206c0efb8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

enterprise-risk is a skill published in the GitHub repository cbrock84/headcount (2,081 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 806 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

rotate-creative

Pause fatigued ads and ship fresh creative variants in their place. Works on both Meta and Google Ads. Use when CTR is dropping, frequency is climbing, or the user says "creative is tired" / "let's refresh ads". Always starts new variants paused.

markifact/markifact-mcp · 57 tokens

launch-google-search

Launch a complete Google Ads Search campaign — campaign, ad group, responsive search ads, keywords, sitelinks, callouts, and negatives — built paused and ready to review. Use when the user wants to spin up a new Search campaign on Google Ads.

markifact/markifact-mcp · 56 tokens

negative-keyword-sweep

Find wasted spend in Google Ads search terms and add negatives at the right scope (account list, campaign, or ad group). Use when the user says "find junk keywords", "stop wasting on bad searches", or wants a search-terms cleanup.

markifact/markifact-mcp · 56 tokens

go

Compatibility entry for Visual Stack's former /vstack:go command. Runs the wireframe and UI review tool, now called review. Use only when the user invokes /vstack:go.

Cavalry-Collective/visual-stack · 41 tokens

save

Save durable decisions, findings, plans, and implementation knowledge from the visible Codex conversation into a new or existing NeatContext context. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to preserve the current conversation as reusable context.

XTSoftwareLabs/neatcontext-plugins · 49 tokens

turbo-pipeline

Use when the user wants a feature built end to end after answering one round of questions and then being left alone — "turbo", "ask me once, then just build it", "I'll answer up front, don't come back to me", "decide the rest yourself". Not for a run that wants a spec approval and no tests (superb:fast-pipeline), one…

kardebadas/claude-plugin · 114 tokens