Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio --skill gate-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/gate-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/gate-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/gate-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01711 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00684 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00342 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
gate-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Gate Check
Phase advancement requires more than vibes. This skill collects every recent verdict artifact, cross-checks them for staleness and consistency, and emits a single PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL ruling. It is intentionally cross-system synthesis — therefore Opus tier.
Phase 1: Determine Source and Target Phase
Parse the argument:
- Explicit form:
prototype->preproduction,preproduction->production,production->polish,polish->release,release->live-ops. --auto— readproduction/stage.txtand use the next standard transition.- No argument — ask the user.
Each gate has a different artifact bar (see Phase 3).
Phase 2: Inventory Recent Artifacts
Glob the latest of each artifact type:
production/qa/qa-signoff-*.mdproduction/qa/smoke-*.mdproduction/perf/perf-profile-*.mdproduction/security/security-audit-*.mdproduction/assets/asset-audit-*.mdproduction/balance/balance-check-*.mdproduction/localization/loc-report-*.mddocs/tech-debt.mdproduction/qa/soak/[date]/summary.mdproduction/releases/release-checklist-*.mdproduction/releases/launch-checklist-*.mddocs/architecture/for ADR statusesproduction/qa/bugs/for open S1/S2 counts
For each, capture: path, last modified date, verdict.
Apply staleness rule: any artifact older than 14 days is suspect for a release-tier gate. Flag and surface.
Phase 3: Apply the Gate-Specific Bar
prototype -> preproduction
Required:
- Architecture artifacts present (
docs/architecture/master-architecture.md, ADRs, control manifest). - All MVP PRDs reviewed via
/review-all-prdswith PASS verdict. - No
proposedADRs blocking.
preproduction -> production
Required:
/test-setupcomplete and CI runs green.- Foundation epics done.
- First sprint plan approved.
production -> polish
Required:
- All Critical / Must-Have features implemented per PRD.
- Latest QA sign-off APPROVED on the most recent sprint.
- Open S1/S2 bugs == 0.
- Tech debt register reviewed in last 30 days.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 245 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A cc23c3c5af67
gate-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio (42 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,711 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-qa
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle — qa-lead strategy and test plan, qa-tester case writing, execution, sign-off.
scaffold-dotnet-test-project
MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero"…
test-result-feedback
Close the acceptance loop for a tested change — consume the apc test TierResult, map EACH acceptance criterion to a pass/fail outcome from structured fields (never chat text), attach an evidence ref, and write it back to the task. A SUT red is a finding, never softened to green.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
cy-execute-task
Implement and verify an existing CompozyOS spec task, then update its tracking. Excludes review remediation.
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.