Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add chanktb/claude-google-ads/plugin install claude-google-adsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chanktb/claude-google-ads/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chanktb/claude-google-ads/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chanktb/claude-google-ads/audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00115 | $0.08265 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.04133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01653 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00826 |
Grade A, and why
google-ads-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 360 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Google Ads — Audit
Read-only diagnostic. Score the account, surface issues by severity, and — critically — never fire a
finding on an unverified assumption. Reuse the live MCP detection proven in setup.
STEP 0 — Load context (MANDATORY, before any scoring)
- Read
account-context.yamlfrom the working directory. If missing, runsetupfirst. - Pull from it:
google_ads.customer_id,brand_terms,competitor_terms,margin_tiers,data_source(for landing-page URL checks),measurement, andguardrails. - Output is written to the working directory (
GOOGLE-ADS-AUDIT.md), never into the plugin.
⚠️ The six guards (apply to EVERY check — they prevent the most common wrong findings)
These are generic; guardrails in the context may strengthen or add to them. Honor both.
- GUARD-1 Conversions — check the WHOLE picture, not the action list. Inspect campaign-level
conversion goals + which actions each active campaign actually fires (segment by
segments.conversion_action_name), and each action's source. A primary action no campaign uses is inert; a second purchase action kept secondary (e.g. GA4 purchase alongside the Shopify channel "App Purchase") is the CORRECT anti-double-count setup, not a bug. Only flag a real micro-conversion goal or two value-carrying purchase sources both primary and both firing. Before flagging ANY conversion-action contamination (out-of-brand / micro / duplicate), checkprimary_for_goal. A non-primary action does not enter Smart Bidding and does not affect performance — it's harmless; surface it as a NOTE (tidy-up), never a scored finding. Only a PRIMARY out-of-brand/micro action that an active campaign optimizes toward is a real issue. See${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/conversion-tracking-logic.md. - GUARD-2 Negatives — FOUR sources, merge ALL. (1)
campaign_criterion(negative=true) — campaign-level; (2)campaign_shared_set→shared_set→shared_criterion— SHARED LISTS (the bulk: e.g. "Account Level Negative", "OPI Negative", brand blocks); (3)customer_negative_criterion— ACCOUNT-LEVEL negatives applied account-wide; (4)campaign_criterion.brand_list.shared_set— brand exclusions. Only flag a gap if terms are absent across ALL FOUR; if a shared/account list covers them, cite it, don't flag. Acampaign_criterion-only pull is the #1 false-positive in this audit — it looks "thin" when coverage is actually 100+ terms/campaign. After merging all four, declarepulled:[...,"negatives_complete"]so the report renders a real verdict; without that assertion a campaign-only bundle renders VERIFY (re-pull), never a false "weak negatives". - GUARD-3 Budget scaling — check
change_eventfirst. Before recommending a budget/bid increase, pull recent change history (~14d). A recent budget/bid/asset/structure change → recommend cooldown, not scale. (Strengthen with anychange-event-cooldownguardrail in context.) - GUARD-4 Ad strength — confirm ENABLED + impressions. Before flagging POOR ad strength, confirm
ad_group.statusANDad_group_ad.statusare ENABLED and the group has impressions. Paused = intentional; do not flag. - GUARD-5 ROAS — apply margin tiers from context. Read
margin_tiers; a line with a tier accepts itsmin_roas(house brands run lower ROAS by design). Never apply a generic ROAS threshold to such a line or a strategic campaign. If unsure, ASK rather than flag. - GUARD-6 No false "absence". MCP results can be truncated (token cap or your
limit). Before claiming "no video / no signal / no negative / no X", re-query filtered on the enum NAME (e.g.field_type = 'YOUTUBE_VIDEO') or pull with returned-rows < limit (proof of completeness). NEVER infer presence/absence by decoding enum integers from memory. Track failed fetches as a G-SYS1 diagnostic; never silently skip a check — explain why data is unavailable.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 360 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A d2170e02b2c8
google-ads-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository chanktb/claude-google-ads (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 8,265 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
google-ads
A Google Ads guide for campaigns and advertising copy aimed at the Russian market in 2026. Google Ads is Google's paid advertising platform, and the guide covers formats such as search, video, app, shopping, and display ads.
markifact-overview
Reference — what Markifact is, what the MCP server exposes, and the discover→inspect→run pattern. Always loaded into the performance-marketer agent.
safe-write-operations
Reference — rules for safely executing write/destructive operations against ad accounts. Always loaded into the performance-marketer agent.
google-ads-ecommerce
Build and optimize Google Ads campaigns for ecommerce with Performance Max, Shopping feeds, conversion tracking, and Smart Bidding strategies for ROAS.
setup-conversion-tracking
Set up Converly conversion tracking end to end. Use when the user wants to track form submissions as conversions, send leads to an ad platform like Google Ads, Meta or Google Analytics, or set up Converly for the first time.
diagnose-missing-conversions
Find out why Converly conversions aren't showing up. Use when the user says tracking isn't working, conversions are missing, a form submission didn't appear, or an ad platform isn't receiving conversions.