chinese-coding

chinese-coding is a skill for Claude Code from ChanningLua/prax-agent. It costs 20 tokens per session (313 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A coding guide that requires comments, documentation, error messages, logs, commit messages, and other user-facing text to be written in Chinese, while code names remain in English.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when writing or reviewing Chinese-language code documentation, comments, errors, logs, tests, README files, and commit messages.
Why use it?
It gives teams a consistent language policy for source code and project communication.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it when writing or reviewing Chinese-language code documentation, comments, errors, logs, tests, README files, and commit messages.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ChanningLua/prax-agent --skill chinese-coding
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChanningLua/prax-agent

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for chinese-coding

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for chinese-coding

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/channinglua/prax-agent/chinese-coding.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 313 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 5
    Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.
    Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00313
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00125
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00063
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00031

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ae84f86bbf79, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

chinese-coding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/prax/skills/chinese-coding/SKILL.md · 45 lines

What it actually says

中文编程技能

规则

  • 所有注释和文档字符串使用中文
  • 变量名和函数名使用英文(遵循 PEP 8 / camelCase),但需有中文注释说明用途
  • 错误信息和日志输出使用中文
  • 提交信息(commit message)使用中文
  • README 和文档文件使用中文

代码风格

# 用户认证模块
class UserAuth:
    """用户认证管理器,处理登录、注销和权限验证。"""

    def verify_token(self, token: str) -> bool:
        """验证 JWT token 是否有效。

        Args:
            token: 待验证的 JWT 字符串

        Returns:
            True 表示 token 有效,False 表示无效或已过期
        """
        ...

注意事项

  • 技术术语(API、HTTP、JSON 等)保持英文
  • 代码中的字符串常量如果面向用户,使用中文
  • 测试用例的描述使用中文
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A ae84f86bbf79

Subscribe to this mod's changes

chinese-coding is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChanningLua/prax-agent (272 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 313 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.