Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chgagne/claude-skills-research --skill running-cluster-experimentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chgagne/claude-skills-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/running-cluster-experiments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/running-cluster-experiments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/running-cluster-experiments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/running-cluster-experiments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/running-cluster-experiments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.05864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.02932 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00586 |
Grade A, and why
running-cluster-experiments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Running Cluster Experiments
Overview
This is the methodology of experiment campaigns on shared clusters. For the
mechanics — MFA, account strings, gres names, quotas, partitions, rsync flags —
REQUIRED BACKGROUND: use using-drac-clusters.
Core principle: a scheduler will kill your job at an arbitrary point, and a cluster will hand you less than you asked for. Design for both, or your allocation buys nothing. Every rule below is a consequence.
The expensive failures are never "the code crashed". They are: the job ran perfectly and wrote nothing; the job ran a different experiment than its name says; the allocation was spent before the first useful instruction.
Never compute on a login node — use an interactive allocation
Login nodes are shared by hundreds of people and staff kill offenders. squeue,
ls, sacct, diskusage_report, editing, sbatch, file transfer: fine.
Anything that loops over data, parses a large file, trains, plots, or runs for
more than a few seconds: not fine — including "just this once to check
something", and including work you started before realising how big it was.
There is always an alternative, so there is never an excuse. Interactive compute is a normal allocation, not a special favour:
salloc --account=<alloc> --cpus-per-task=4 --mem=16G --time=1:00:00 # shell on a compute node
srun --jobid=<id> --pty bash # shell inside a running job
Short interactive requests usually start in seconds — a measured example: a 1-hour CPU job and a 30-minute GPU job on a busy cluster both began within ~2 minutes, while an 8-hour job on the same cluster waited 13 hours. Asking for less gets you compute faster than not asking at all.
If interactive scheduling is genuinely slow, the answer is sbatch, not the
login node.
Build a cost model before you choose a walltime
Measure per-unit cost at the real configuration, on the machine that will run it, then multiply. Not at a smaller model, not at a shorter run, not on a different cluster, not from last quarter's estimate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 416 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 7f78fbb87bcf
running-cluster-experiments is a skill published in the GitHub repository chgagne/claude-skills-research (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 5,864 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-writer
Medical/scientific paper writing workflow skill. Manages the full pipeline from literature search to submission-ready manuscript. Creates and manages a project directory with IMRAD-format section files, literature matrix, reference management, and quality checklists. Supports both English and Japanese papers.…
food-research
Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for food & nutrition science. Use when the user wants to research a food/nutrition topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, screen and synthesize many sources, verify citations, or scope a systematic review.…
food-paper
Multi-subagent manuscript system for food & nutrition science covering the whole research process: understand the field, frame research questions, curate and analyze data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal-aware throughout. Includes a…
food-pipeline
Master orchestrator for the whole food & nutrition research-to-publication workflow. Coordinates the specialist skills — each with its own subagent set — into one governed path: journal selection, research (food-research / food-deep-research), writing & analysis (food-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review…
food-deep-research
General-purpose deep research that produces a fully written, source-validated literature review on any question: scope it, design the method, discover and screen sources by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review (APA 7.0 by…
food-figure
Comprehensive figure system for food & nutrition manuscripts: analyzes the user's data, recommends the best figure(s) to make, then produces submission-grade graphics in Python or R at the target journal's spec. Handles all common scientific figure types (bar/box/violin, line/kinetic, scatter/regression, Bland–Altman…