Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition --skill food-papergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutritionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00180 | $0.02417 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00072 | $0.00967 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00483 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
food-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Food-Paper — Whole-Process Manuscript System for Food & Nutrition Science
Take a food/nutrition study from data and idea to a submission-ready, journal- formatted manuscript, using a team of subagents for each stage of the research and writing process. Original work; architecture informed by open community paper-writing and Nature-style skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements).
First move — resolve the target journal (once)
Before drafting, load journal-selector/SKILL.md (a shared procedure, not an
installed skill) and follow it — it asks the author which journal
they are targeting (they may answer 'generic' for APA 7.0 defaults). Do this
once: record the resolved journal and its constraints and reuse them for every
subagent and stage — do not ask again. Re-run journal-selector only if the
author asks to switch journals, or reuse the choice already resolved by
food-pipeline/an earlier turn. The constraints govern structure, word/abstract
limits, reference style, and the figure spec passed to food-figure.
Modes
- full (default) — the whole pipeline: field → questions → data/stats → figures → argument → draft → polish → self-review.
- plan — Socratic planning of the paper chapter by chapter (no full draft).
- outline — detailed outline + evidence map only.
- section — draft or rewrite one section (intro/methods/results/discussion/abstract).
- stats — statistical analysis plan/execution guidance only.
- revise — revise against an existing review (a
food-reviewreport and/or margin comments on a Word file). Edit the original.docxwith Tracked Changes (do not start a fresh copy), resolving each comment. Insidefood-pipeline: update the existing Review & Response Report (.docx) in place with each item's response — no separate response letter. Standalone (real journal reviewers): produce a point-by-point response letter as a new Word document. All deliverables are.docx, never Markdown. Seereferences/revision-response.md. - format-convert — convert a draft to the target journal's structure + reference style; output Markdown, LaTeX (.tex), or DOCX, and build a PDF via Pandoc or
latexmk(seereferences/latex-guide.md). Yes — this skill can prepare and edit LaTeX drafts. When the source is a Word file, preserve EndNote/Zotero/Mendeley citation fields (references/word-field-codes.md) — don't flatten field codes into text. - polish — language editing to publication-quality English and removal of AI writing tells (
polisherrunsreferences/human-writing.md): inflated significance, "-ing" tack-ons, vague attribution ("studies have shown" → a real citation), stock AI vocabulary, "serves as" → "is", filler, hedge stacking, generic upbeat endings — then the two-pass check "what still reads as machine-written?". Keeps calibrated hedging, passive Methods, and journal-mandated form; never changes a number, claim scope, or citation. Good for non-native-English drafts and for anything AI helped write.
What ships with it
24 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/argument_builder.md 1.3 KB
- agents/citation_manager.md 1.3 KB
- agents/data_curator.md 1.6 KB
- agents/draft_writer.md 3.8 KB
- agents/intake.md 2.0 KB
- agents/internal_reviewer.md 1.4 KB
- agents/literature_lead.md 1.2 KB
- agents/polisher.md 2.2 KB
- agents/question_framer.md 1.2 KB
- agents/statistician.md 2.0 KB
- agents/structure_architect.md 1.3 KB
- agents/viz_designer.md 1.5 KB
- references/apa7-quickref.md 1.7 KB
- references/declarations-guide.md 5.6 KB
- references/faithfulness-and-citation.md 3.6 KB
- references/human-writing.md 14 KB
- references/latex-guide.md 2.9 KB
- references/paper-structure.md 1.7 KB
- references/privacy-and-confidentiality.md 2.1 KB
- references/revision-response.md 6.4 KB
- references/statistics-reporting.md 1.7 KB
- references/word-field-codes.md 2.7 KB
- references/writing-quality-check.md 2.7 KB
- references/writing-style.md 3.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A ef52cd88e1cd
food-paper is a skill published in the GitHub repository PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition (38 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 2,417 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-framework-figure-studio-pro
Human-in-the-loop research-paper framework figure workflow from S0-PAPER-FOUNDATION through terminal S5-CANDIDATE-IMAGE. Use for paper-grounded architecture, pipeline, method overview, agent workflow, system/data-flow, and mechanism figures with generated raster first-round/formal candidates, reviewer-first-glance…
paper-polish-pipeline
Staged, diagnosis-driven academic paper polishing pipeline (bilingual 中文/English). Use to revise a paper from rough draft to final submission across ordered stages: diagnose first, then optimize section by section, derive abstract/contributions from the revised body, polish the language to reduce AI-sounding phrasing…
nature-reviewer
A peer-review checklist that assesses a research paper from a referee’s point of view, including its novelty, importance, and technical soundness.
autofigure
Generate clean, EDITABLE vector figures (SVG + exact-size PDF) for research papers — method / architecture / pipeline / system-overview diagrams — with AutoFigure-Edit. Use whenever the user wants to create or vectorize a paper figure from a text description OR from a draft/screenshot/draw.io image: it generates a…
nature-academic-search
Multi-source literature search, citation verification, MeSH search strategy, citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, ID conversion) via MCP tools (PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect). Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step…
nature-citation
Add strict Nature/CNS citations to manuscript text by splitting long passages into citable segments, searching only accepted flagship and subjournal titles from Nature Portfolio, the AAAS Science family, and Cell Press, filtering by publication time range, and exporting one reference-manager-ready output by default.…