Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cohen-liel/hivemind. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cohen-liel/hivemind/main/.claude/skills/coding-agent/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cohen-liel/hivemindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cohen-liel/hivemind/coding-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cohen-liel/hivemind/coding-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cohen-liel/hivemind/coding-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cohen-liel/hivemind/coding-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cohen-liel/hivemind/coding-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00157 | $0.02748 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.01099 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00550 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00275 |
Grade B, and why
coding-agent scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
**Model:** `gpt-5.2-codex` is the default (set in ~/.codex/config.toml) This is a copy
88% identical to coding-agent — 41 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Agent (bash-first)
Use bash (with optional background mode) for all coding agent work. Simple and effective.
⚠️ PTY Mode: Codex/Pi/OpenCode yes, Claude Code no
For Codex, Pi, and OpenCode, PTY is still required (interactive terminal apps):
# ✅ Correct for Codex/Pi/OpenCode
bash pty:true command:"codex exec 'Your prompt'"
For Claude Code (claude CLI), use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions instead.
--dangerously-skip-permissions with PTY can exit after the confirmation dialog.
--print mode keeps full tool access and avoids interactive confirmation:
# ✅ Correct for Claude Code (no PTY needed)
cd /path/to/project && claude --permission-mode bypassPermissions --print 'Your task'
# For background execution: use background:true on the exec tool
# ❌ Wrong for Claude Code
bash pty:true command:"claude --dangerously-skip-permissions 'task'"
Bash Tool Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
command |
string | The shell command to run |
pty |
boolean | Use for coding agents! Allocates a pseudo-terminal for interactive CLIs |
workdir |
string | Working directory (agent sees only this folder's context) |
background |
boolean | Run in background, returns sessionId for monitoring |
timeout |
number | Timeout in seconds (kills process on expiry) |
elevated |
boolean | Run on host instead of sandbox (if allowed) |
Process Tool Actions (for background sessions)
| Action | Description |
|---|---|
list |
List all running/recent sessions |
poll |
Check if session is still running |
log |
Get session output (with optional offset/limit) |
write |
Send raw data to stdin |
submit |
Send data + newline (like typing and pressing Enter) |
send-keys |
Send key tokens or hex bytes |
paste |
Paste text (with optional bracketed mode) |
kill |
Terminate the session |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 296 lines · 157 tokens per session scan B c2db324a6adf
coding-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository cohen-liel/hivemind (112 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 2,748 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). It is 88% identical to coding-agent, differing in 41 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
cross-model-review
A second-opinion code review that asks a different AI model to independently inspect a change, then compares both reviews. It focuses on logic, security, consistency, and omissions.
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by OpenBitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.