Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to crbnos/carbon. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/crbnos/carbon/main/.claude/skills/grill/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crbnos/carbonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/grill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/grill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/grill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/grill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/grill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 92 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00163 | $0.01388 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00065 | $0.00555 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
grill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · +3 lines d30a11da40b0
- 29d ago Changed · +1 tokens per session cfb708ba12f2
- 2mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A 32ec310e090f
grill is a skill published in the GitHub repository crbnos/carbon (2,783 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 163 tokens to every session and 1,388 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plan-writing-gherkin-criteria
Guide for writing Gherkin acceptance criteria in Given-When-Then syntax: scenario structure, background blocks, scenario outlines with examples tables, common authentication, CRUD, validation, and error patterns, and testable specifications.
writing-browser-e2e-tests
Playwright E2E testing standards from authoritative docs/explanation/software-engineering/automation-testing/tools/playwright/ documentation.
developing-applications
Guides language-agnostic application work: placing code in the right layer, deciding where each error is handled or propagated, what a log line carries, where input is validated, and building every behaviour test-first.
exploratory-testing
Guides session-based exploratory testing of a running interface or API: framing charters, choosing tours, citing a specification, contract, or design for every expected result, telling a defect from a gap, and staying non-destructive.
programming-fsharp
Guides F# work under the F# standard: placing each new file in the compile order, reaching a red that fails on an assertion, choosing among option, result, and exception, and finding invariants worth a property-based test.
programming-javascript
Guides JavaScript work under the JavaScript standard: confirming the file is type-checked, typing through JSDoc, validating input the checker cannot see, and noticing floating promises and swallowed errors before handing off.