Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/curtisthe/three-pillars-plugin/tp-spike-implementnpx skills add CurtisThe/three-pillars-plugin --skill tp-spike-implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CurtisThe/three-pillars-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/curtisthe/three-pillars-plugin/tp-spike-implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curtisthe/three-pillars-plugin/tp-spike-implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curtisthe/three-pillars-plugin/tp-spike-implement.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01800 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00900 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00360 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
tp-spike-implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spike Implement
Execute phases from a spike plan serially, with human review gates between phases.
Arguments:
{spike-name}(required), optionally a phase number (e.g.,my-spike 2). Without a phase number, executes the next incomplete phase.--auto(optional) — autonomous mode. Skips phase confirmation, auto-continues at phase boundaries, retries blocked tasks with simplification (max 3 attempts), logs all decisions todecisions.md. Seeskills/_shared/auto-mode.mdfor convention.
Prerequisites
three-pillars-docs/tp-designs/{spike-name}/plan.mdmust exist. If not, tell the user to run/tp-spike-plan {spike-name}first and stop.
Steps
- Run first-run preflight per skills/_shared/first-run.md.
0a. Run cwd preflight per skills/_shared/cwd-preflight.md: python3 "$TP_ROOT"/skills/_shared/cwd_preflight.py {spike-name}. Exit 3 → stop and show the cd fix. Exit 0 → continue.
-
Run collaboration preflight per
skills/_shared/collaboration.mdwithphase: "spike-implement". This verifies the branch and lock before writing code. Honor--force-takeoverif passed. In--automode, do not prompt — if the lock is held by another developer, log the conflict todecisions.mdand stop. -
Read
plan.mdfrom the design directory. -
Determine which phase to execute:
- If a phase number was given, use that.
- Otherwise, find the first phase with unfinished tasks (no
**Status**:line or status is not Done/Skipped).
-
Phase confirmation:
- Normal mode: Show the user which phase you are about to execute and how many tasks it contains. Ask for confirmation.
--automode: Log the phase start todecisions.mdand proceed without confirmation.
-
For each task in the phase, execute serially (no worktrees, no parallel agents):
For each task:
- Hypothesis: Read what the task expects to learn or build.
- Try: Implement the task directly. Prioritize speed — no mandatory test-first, no strict red-green-refactor. Write tests when they add value, skip ceremony when they do not.
- Evaluate: Check if the result works. Run any existing tests for affected files. Judge whether the task outcome matches the Hypothesis.
- Update status: Add
**Status**: Doneto the task in plan.md. If the task fails after reasonable effort, mark it**Status**: Blockedwith a short reason and continue to the next task. - Commit: Per
skills/_shared/commit-after-work.md, commit the experiment. Artifact paths to stage: the tracked code files the experiment touched,three-pillars-docs/tp-designs/<spike-name>/plan.md(updated status), any new files underthree-pillars-docs/tp-designs/<spike-name>/demos/produced by this experiment (typicallydemos/<NN>-*where<NN>is the experiment number), andthree-pillars-docs/tp-designs/<spike-name>/decisions.mdif--automode appended an entry. Demos and decisions are tracked — they are the spike's evidence record. Stage only files this experiment touched, not the entiredemos/directory. Commit message:Spike: <spike-name> <phase>.<experiment>. --automode — retry on failure: If a task fails, don't immediately mark it Blocked. Instead:- Log a simplification entry to
decisions.mddescribing what failed and why. - Simplify the approach (reduce scope, use mocks, skip edge cases, use simpler implementation).
- Retry the task with the simplified approach.
- Repeat up to 3 attempts total. If all 3 fail, mark as
**Status**: Abandoned (3 attempts exhausted)and log the full history todecisions.md.
- Log a simplification entry to
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 73 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 2de655ed4ebb
tp-spike-implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository CurtisThe/three-pillars-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,800 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…